easyt63

It's actually 4 11x17 boards. Total measure is 44 x 17. Pretty incredible. Yes, everything is framed. The 20 covers I have left are all side by side on one wall.

This one has also been a favorite of mine.

Here is my Invincible pride and joy!

Glad you like! Pleasure selling to you!

A sideshow statue of Eve would rock! Great issue by the way. Anyone know the latest sales numbers?

If you don't mind me asking, what was the cost and size for something like that?

It's a great series, shame it doesn't get much recognition.

I'm a skimmer, what can I say. He could always reach out to Mark when a cover gets solicited.

Reach out to Mark Hay who runs splashpageart.com BEFORE he lists the cover. When an issue gets solicited and you like the cover, contact Mark.

Sorry guys. Went to dinner with the wife. Anyways, I love all of you. Still mad we can't score OA from Saga. So....hi.

You're right, that is her priority. Am I not allowed to voice an argument against it? Or voice an opinion? Are you the Governor?

I think it was the fact I used the word stupid, in which I apologize for.

Not completely. Jeff, when did you become such a male reproductive organ? It was a simple point of view. I think you took it a bit seriously.

Um...no. How is that? Does making physical art stop you or effect the price of the comic?

Guillory.

So anyways...anyone looking forward to #2?

To be honest, here is the gist of the discussion (one that always spirals out of control when someone stands against a creator): Why go digital fully and not figure out a way to be just as efficient on paper. Don't use the get a inker and colorist argument. If artists don't learn photoshop or corel, then same on them. I learned photoshop in a couple weeks. When you practice to one day be in comics, wouldn't you figure out how to be efficient? Why would you work so hard to become a good enough artist and visual storyteller and not capitalize on the OA sales? So, lets take a step back on this...does anyone think that it is odd that Fiona (and other fully digital artists) don't produce physical art, especially with the nature of this business? It's art. People collect art. Why not oblige and benefit from it?

Then enjoy it. I applaud her devotion to the title being a higher priority than milking it for every $ she can. I really enjoy buying Chew OA and I was one of many trying to find Saga OA initially. At the end of the day I enjoy the start of the book and that's the most important. So I will now for all the graded copies I'm about to sell. Blame Krighton. He influenced me to do it. What if Rob went only digital?

So you guys are not going to stop and look at this from a business sense, just going to defend away? Ok, maybe Adam Hughes and JSC should just go all digital since its the new way to do it and paper is outdated. Tony Moore should have done all his WD art digitally too. And when it comes to commissions...anyone ever received one? I'm not talking a quick sketch in your sketchbook either.

By the way, I really enjoyed Saga.

Eh, whatever. So is she saying that she really wouldn't have a career in comics if it weren't for a computer? I know there are always 'defend the creator' people on here, and everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but it's kind of weak she can't bust it out on paper. She could do layouts digitally then print it and ink. Tons of amazing artists do this, like Mark Brooks and Ruan Ottley. She is sitting on wasted cash, wouldn't you find a way to tap it and still keep the final product solid?

Me too! Fiona! Do you hear this? Stop being stupid in throwing away money. We want original art. You're neglecting a very profitable niche.

I find it amazing that artists go digital completely. Why would you give up that revenue stream?

Makes a ton of sense if you read the six page origin story of Michonne in Playboy.

Yup, Jeff's persistence is why he is the first in line to my Chew #3 cover if I ever sell.