• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Domo Arigato

Member
  • Posts

    6,908
  • Joined

Everything posted by Domo Arigato

  1. Well...you're not doing a very good job of it.
  2. Funny. That's just what I was thinking about the ongoing discussion about it and why I started the poll. Still not sure why you're so scared of it. Perhaps your avatar is appropriate also.
  3. I do know how it works. It seems like a mistake might have been made. So perhaps the ones who initially added him made an error.
  4. He was nominated, discussed and added. Who made the decision to add him? He was nominated, discussed and added. So you don't know. Learn how the PL list works I know how the PL list works. I'm just wondering why it seems like more people think he shouldn't have been added to the list. Were mistakes made when he was added? I'm simply wondering who made the final judgment call to add him to the list based on the discussion at the time.
  5. He was nominated, discussed and added. Who made the decision to add him? He was nominated, discussed and added. So you don't know.
  6. He was nominated, discussed and added. Who made the decision to add him?
  7. It's just a poll to see what people think. You sure do seem scared. Then you don't know the meaning of the word. Sure I do. However....you don't seem to know the meaning of a simple poll.
  8. Both under the circumstances in front of us. Where is that rule listed?
  9. It's just a poll to see what people think. You sure do seem scared.
  10. Exactly. I believe the current standard is a 30 day wait. 30 days later it could still be wrong. Could but also could not. This is why we wait 30 days and not rush to judgement. Who's rushing to judgment? It's a poll to see what other people think instead of the few who prefer to camp in here waiting for the next post.
  11. Who is the "we" you are referring to? And how much discussion is enough? I think all the "facts" that we are going to get are in here already. Whether oceanavekid and jawn work out their personal differences is up to them. As Rupp had mentioned, the discussion has been beaten to death and pretty much all I see is the same people saying the same things over and over again. I don't see anyone changing their mind or making new or fresh arguments. Jawn has stated his stance in here (again) and oceanavekid has done the same (again). I'm interested in how many people are for and against...so I started the poll. So long as nobody expects the results to affect the list. So long as you don't think you're in control in here. I don't and neither do you. The established rules say your poll does not change the list. (thumbs u I don't act like I am. You do. And my poll will show what people think is the right thing to do and who are the vocal and incorrect minority. (thumbs u Yes, you do. Seems you just haven't learned that about yourself yet. Nice analysis of your poll. No I don't...you do. And the poll will speak for itself.
  12. No poll required yet. (thumbs u Yes there was. You don't control things in here. (thumbs u I thought it was up to the nominating party? Up to the nomination party for what? Rupp suggested. A vote on a second chance. According to the rules, the accuser can only request removal from the list. My poll was geared more towards whether or not oceanavekid ever deserved to be on the list in the first place regarding this transaction. As far as the user requesting removal, oceanavekid did make a post (last night?) that he would rather not be on the list, but he seems to feel it's a lost cause for him and has just sort of thrown up his hands at it all. His "request" is as bad as his items not being for sale. So nice you wish to jump in and make everything right.....your way. So sorry everyone doesn't want it your way. Why are you so scared of a poll?
  13. Exactly. He isn't. Book for sale Book offered to be purchased Book denied as he wanted more money, refuses to complete transaction. It is no different then: Book for sale Book offered to be purchased Book not paid for as found for cheaper from another location That's one opinion. Others have been offered in here, so I put it to a vote to see where the numbers stand.
  14. Exactly. I believe the current standard is a 30 day wait. 30 days later it could still be wrong.
  15. Who is the "we" you are referring to? And how much discussion is enough? I think all the "facts" that we are going to get are in here already. Whether oceanavekid and jawn work out their personal differences is up to them. As Rupp had mentioned, the discussion has been beaten to death and pretty much all I see is the same people saying the same things over and over again. I don't see anyone changing their mind or making new or fresh arguments. Jawn has stated his stance in here (again) and oceanavekid has done the same (again). I'm interested in how many people are for and against...so I started the poll. So long as nobody expects the results to affect the list. So long as you don't think you're in control in here. I don't and neither do you. The established rules say your poll does not change the list. (thumbs u I don't act like I am. You do. And my poll will show what people think is the right thing to do and who are the vocal and incorrect minority. (thumbs u
  16. No poll required yet. (thumbs u Yes there was. You don't control things in here. (thumbs u I thought it was up to the nominating party? Up to the nomination party for what? Rupp suggested. A vote on a second chance. According to the rules, the accuser can only request removal from the list. My poll was geared more towards whether or not oceanavekid ever deserved to be on the list in the first place regarding this transaction. As far as the user requesting removal, oceanavekid did make a post (last night?) that he would rather not be on the list, but he seems to feel it's a lost cause for him and has just sort of thrown up his hands at it all.
  17. No poll required yet. (thumbs u Yes there was. You don't control things in here. (thumbs u I thought it was up to the nominating party? Up to the nominating party for what?
  18. Who is the "we" you are referring to? And how much discussion is enough? I think all the "facts" that we are going to get are in here already. Whether oceanavekid and jawn work out their personal differences is up to them. As Rupp had mentioned, the discussion has been beaten to death and pretty much all I see is the same people saying the same things over and over again. I don't see anyone changing their mind or making new or fresh arguments. Jawn has stated his stance in here (again) and oceanavekid has done the same (again). I'm interested in how many people are for and against...so I started the poll. So long as nobody expects the results to affect the list. So long as you don't think you're in control in here.
  19. No poll required yet. (thumbs u Yes there was. You don't control things in here. (thumbs u
  20. Who is the "we" you are referring to? And how much discussion is enough? I think all the "facts" that we are going to get are in here already. Whether oceanavekid and jawn work out their personal differences is up to them. As Rupp had mentioned, the discussion has been beaten to death and pretty much all I see is the same people saying the same things over and over again. I don't see anyone changing their mind or making new or fresh arguments. Jawn has stated his stance in here (again) and oceanavekid has done the same (again). I'm interested in how many people are for and against...so I started the poll. You are free to keep discussing it if you want.