• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Tom789

Member
  • Posts

    210
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Tom789

  1. On 4/8/2023 at 10:37 PM, SolidShredder said:

    It's very hard to grade slabbed books but I'll try... I see spine ticks, blunted corners, a corner crease?, and overspray (shouldn't affect grade). That could be color rub, can't say for sure. I'm guessing this book got a much lower grade than you thought? The reason I guess that is because I can see a curvature to the middle of the book, it goes from the top to the bottom. That's a telltale sign of a sub crease or something similar. It's probably invisible in the slab but under close inspection breaks the fibers all the way down the book. That would be enough to drop a book like this from an apparent high grade to a 5 or 6 depending on if the crease breaks the fibers on both sides of the cover. If it's only on the back it would be incredibly hard to see on all that white, especially behind the slab. Looks like that's the direction of the "fold" too. That's my guess anyway. 

    EDIT : Now that I look at it some more, it's awefully wavy in general. Could also have moisture or water damage that has been cleaned up. (shrug)

    The curvature is from the camera and I think most of what you're describing isn't actually there, due to the low resolution and also some reflection off the slab.  There's no waviness, sub crease or water damage. I'll post some more images later today at a 2x setting on my smartphone.

  2. This is a CGC-graded book.  I am a bit puzzled with the grade.  What do you think?  I will reveal the grade after some answers.  The back top left corner looks like it has a piece missing but that is a 1/8" crease not mentioned in the grader's notes and is white, so much better than the photo depicts.  What looks like color rub on the front cover to the right of the balloon "or am I going mad?" is a reflection off the case.

    P.S. The resolution always looks better on my computer than on the forum.  I don't know of a way to improve it here.

     

    20230408_220449.thumb.jpg.850c039bb9444d4c9e512e4eb9f89d0f.jpg20230408_220609.thumb.jpg.623a4c6c3d35069023820d1c3ea323a2.jpg

     

     

     

  3. The teflon sheets I've seen pictures of have small lines that might leave impressions on the covers.  I use silicone parchment paper as the item touching the comic book cover during a heat press.  When I was starting, I saw lots of recommendations to use silicone release paper but my limited search abilities couldn't find any in a size large enough to cover a comic book, although I'm sure they're out there.  The silicone paper (do NOT use baking parchment paper) is reusable many, many times and works well for me.

    Silicone parchment paper on eBay

     

  4. I just won my first auction at ComicLink and I paid with a check.  The check cleared 5 days ago, but I've received no communication from them that I've paid in full or that the item has shipped.  Is this normal?

  5. On 3/9/2023 at 10:50 AM, marvelmaniac said:

    Is this the book you are referring to?

    s-l1600.png

    I just looked at four CGC NM/MT 9.8 books and some 9.6/9.4's on eBay and none have those ticks, chances are they are not production flaws.

    Exactly where are these ticks located?

    Can we get a clear pic of the entire front cover?

    Here it is.  The defect is on the right edge below the yellow text.

    I didn't mean to imply that this was a defect unique to this cover.  It doesn't look to me like a handling defect, so I was just curious how it would be treated.  It probably wouldn't get a 9.8 anyway due to the lower right corner damage.

     

    20230309_195432.thumb.jpg.dee8e663d290fdaa02b9806c458b9b3b.jpg

  6. I apologize if this has been covered already, but I don't have time to wade through all 34 pages!  (I did look at the first few).

    I've come across several Marvel books now that have a line of raised ridges on the cover.  I assume this is an impression from a roller to move the book along the production line, and thus wouldn't count against a potential 9.8.  Is this a known production issue?

    20230308_095809a.thumb.jpg.259eff6ec5f59a217b38b7a7d906c176.jpg

  7. I don't know why it wants to post these pictures sideways.  Haven't had this problem before and can't seem to fix it.

    - 1" curved tear on front top edge

    - 1" strip of color lift front top edge near spine

    - multiple reader creases and spine stress lines

    - 1/4" spine split at bottom

    - staples firmly attached, interior complete

    - multiple stains/foxing on back cover

    I'm thinking 3.5/4.0?

    image.thumb.jpeg.42f665329f0eb9143ba847be4114bddf.jpeg

    image.thumb.jpeg.6253cc60f1fab81f1a74a8cc0291adc6.jpeg

  8. On 3/1/2023 at 8:06 AM, marvelmaniac said:

    I assume this book received a Blue label?

    If you are referring to the piece missing on the outer edge then Yes, IMO, that should prevent the book from being a NM+ 9.6.

    The question then becomes was that piece missing when the book was graded or did it happen after encapsulation?

    IMO, a book that may otherwise be a NM+ 9.6 with an 1/8" piece missing is not going to be graded any higher than a VF/NM 9.0.

    GD 2.0 - The largest piece allowed missing from the front or back cover is usually a 1/2" triangle or a 1/4" square, although some Silver Age books such as 1960s Marvels have had the price corner box clipped from the top left front cover and may be considered Good if they would otherwise have graded higher. 

    GD/VG 3.0 -  A triangle from 1/4" to 1/2" can be missing out of the corner or edge; a missing 1/8" to 1/4" square is also acceptable. 

    VG 4.0 - As much as a 1/4" triangle can be missing out of the corner or edge; a missing 1/8" square is also acceptable. 

    VG/FN 5.0 and up - There is no mention of missing pieces.

    The CGC grading guidebook appears to disagree significantly with this, although perhaps I am misinterpreting your post:

    p. 284 describing a 9.0 - "a small 1/4" missing piece is allowed".

    p. 288 describing an 8.0 - 1/2" x 1/2".

    p. 296 describing a 6.0 - Accumulation of 1" x 1".

    p. 302 describing a 4.5 - Accumulation of 2" x 2".

    p. 308 describing a 3.0 - Accumulation of 3" x 3".