• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Hibou

Member
  • Posts

    8,647
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hibou

  1. A drawing for a project I am working on.

     

    If you guys wouldn't mind, based on what you see here how old is she?

     

    It could be a trick. Is she a vampire?

     

    No

     

    So come on Karl.... are you gonna tell us what your secret question and project are all about ? :grin:

     

    She is supposed to be 15. Those who said 28, 30 ... thanks, I will need to revise her look. Guesses were 15-30.

    The project is my own creator owned story/ comic book. My goal is to go through Image. Back in the 90's when I was trying to be a comic artist it was all work for hire and nothing creator owned. Times have changed.

    Thanks for asking.

     

    I was going to say around 19/20... I love the line work!

  2. This was 2 years back. Did any come back better than 9.8?
    No. 7 copies passed a Classics Incorporated 9.8 prescreen and were submitted to CGC. 5 copies came back 9.8 and 2 received 9.6 status.

     

    You should read this whole thread. It's really great.

     

    7?

     

    Out of 1500 copies?

     

    Or do I need to read the whole thread...?

    I think you need to read the whole thread.

     

    My "7 copies" reference is completely wrong. doh!

     

    I just skimmed the whole thread.

     

    The problem that CGC has, and it's a very big one, is that they are extremely overprotective of the 9.9 and 10 grades, and way, way, wayyyy too liberal with the 9.8 grades.

     

    I've subbed nearly 2,000 books at this point, and hit 9.8s with no problem, even without a safety net (prescreen.)

     

    I have subbed, in six years, exactly 6 books that graded 10, and a single 9.9. I've got at least 4 books in 9.8 slabs that are no contest 9.9s. Yes, I know everyone says that, but I have dealt only in ultra high grade for 2+ decades. I take magnifying loupes to comics. I don't think anyone would disagree with me, especially in light of many of the books that get a 9.8. These "9.8s" are substantially, obviously, MEASURABLY better than the standard 9.8s, but they get put in 9.8 slabs.

     

    It makes no sense to have a book that has an oxidized bottom staple from water damage grade a 9.8....and a book that has a single fleck, no bigger than the period at the end of this sentence, and THAT'S IT...also be a 9.8.

     

    I suspect it is the culture of Borock and Haspel that has instilled this into everyone grading moderns. It's not so much that the ceiling is 9.8, is that to BREAK that ceiling, a book has to not just BE flawless...it has to IMPRESS the finalizer.

     

    This isn't a bad thing, unless it's taken to the extreme, as CGC has.

     

    So, I keep the ultra high grade stuff raw. Not worth the cost to get it in a 9.8 slab. I've got 3-4 long boxes of the stuff. I'm happy to keep them as is, until the culture changes.

     

    Very good point!

  3. Got this in the mail today: Spirit section from 9/28/47.

     

    Overstreet says: "1st mention of Flying Saucers in comics - 3 months after 1st sighting in Idaho on 6/25/47."

    Which isn't quite right - the sighting was actually in Washington state (by Kenneth Arnold, a pilot from Idaho) on 6/24/47. hm

     

    Of course, Eisner not only taps the headlines for material, he also throws in a wicked Orson Welles parody for good measure.

     

    gg017.jpg

     

    THIS IS AWESOME!...thanks for sharing.

     

    mm

     

     

    That is very cool!

     

    'Awesome Bells'... lol

     

    And what a great idea for a thread!!