Zonker:
- If this character were known as AN Unknown Soldier, then sure, its generic.
But the character described in OAAW 168 is referred to as THE Unknown Soldier (The one and only). Look at the caption on the cover:
"I knew THE Unknown Soldier" not AN Unknown Soldier.
- And just because the character is dressed differently and later follows a different modus operandi does not change the "concept" of the Unknown Soldier as a comic book character. And yes the concept, while in its "infancy," is clear enough to have a title (as Kubert and company aptly provided in OAAW #168).
bronzejohnny