• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Solar

Member
  • Posts

    4,783
  • Joined

Posts posted by Solar

  1. Since that auction, though, prices have been falling like crazy. A really nice Michonne page from WD #19, with her first appearance, only sold for $500:

     

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/walking-dead-Issue-19-Pg-18-original-art-Feat-Michonne-/252194970576?hash=item3ab7fddbd0%3Ag%3AmSgAAOSwp5JWXh9W&nma=true&si=bo5bVfLKfx80HfL%252Fk0uA7TuqIMo%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557

     

    Oh wait...that was a BIN.

     

    Never mind.

     

    :P:cry:

     

    Holy shizzle on a stick. Congrats to the buyer.

     

    What is the Fair Market Estimate of this piece if it came to auction ? [/quote

     

    I hate when I leave a zero off my BIN price lol
  2. It would really be a mind blowing exercise, but it is interesting to consider how many multiples of value an A+ page is over the A/B pages. (Are there D/F pages? I guess so, but in Sandman? Anyway, I digress...) For example, Jill Thompson Sandman A+ may indeed belong in the $3-$5K tier, but I bought ($400/page) and sold (at around $600/page) a 3 page sequence in the last few years and sold a really nice A page for under $2K (Destiny, Dream and Delirium all on page and I had tried selling it for a while, a memorable moment as well - you would remember it immediately). "Lesser" Sandman artists pages are a third of the A+ pages at least, no?

     

    I just now saw this reply to my post from a year ago lol

     

    A-level Thompson Sandman (not just A+) is definitely in this range consistently. Here are a couple semi-recent examples (grades are obviously IMO):

     

    B+

    http://comics.ha.com/itm/original-comic-art/jill-thompson-sandman-v2-47-brief-lives-part-7-page-6-dream-and-delirium-original-art-dc-1993-/a/7104-91274.s?ic4=GalleryView-Thumbnail-071515

     

    B/B-

    http://comics.ha.com/itm/original-comic-art/jill-thompson-and-vince-locke-sandman-v2-46-page-22-dream-and-delirium-original-art-dc-vertigo-1993-total-4-items-/a/7104-91273.s?ic4=GalleryView-ShortDescription-071515

     

    In Sandman, from what I've seen/experienced, the multiples come in to play for Endless vs. non-Endless pages. Sandman pages without an Endless family member barely even register any interest. It's not an A or B page unless it features Morpheus and/or Death.

  3. New Mutants #87 = 1st Cable

    New Mutants #86 = Not in story likeness preview of unnamed character who I guess is Cable, and will be called a Cable cameo for sure by people who own copies of the book and want to make a quick $20-$30 for them once any Cable related hype starts.

    Uncanny X-men #201 = 1st app. of a baby that was included in the origin of Cable to retroactively be him years after the introduction of Cable. Soon this book will be uprooted from any of its legitimacy when the exact issue # where Madelyn Prior's baby bump first appeared is ascertained.

     

    If NM86 is the first Cable, then Detective Comics 16 is the first Superman.

  4. The covers seem like a rehash of DKR. Most of these covers looks like scenes from DKR. I thought these were covers for the new story?

     

    Yeah the variant theme is definitely homage to DKR. I doubt the artists were provided with any advance info on the plot of the new book.

     

    Indeed...as well, the DKR imagery is what fanboys want and DC certainly knows that.

     

    DK3 plot via Bleeding Cool:

     

    http://www.bleedingcool.com/2015/10/29/dark-knight-iii-is-about-the-liberation-of-kandor-frank-miller-talks-plot-and-we-get-a-first-coloures-lettered-look-at-pages/

     

    Hmm...the plot sounds like more DKSA-style silliness. The preview pages looked solid though.

  5. Glad to see the creators post! It would be a real shame to see this title fade into obscurity. It's been one of my favorite reads since the first issue. I bought OA from the book at ECCC '13 before I even read the book, just 'cause it looked so damn cool and it definitely delivered on that early promise.

  6. Besides the obvious mega-$$$ vintage cards, does a card's current status determine its price?

     

    I.e. If I bought the art for a card that was awesome in 2002, but sucks now, will it sell well because people who were heavy into the game in '02 are nostalgic for it? Or does it tank because it's irrelevant now, kind of like modern sports cards and the whole 'hot rookie' syndrome.

  7. Another day, another variant. Simon Bisley's is up for sale on CAF and on eBay (carrying a $6,500 BIN).

     

    0u2M95qk_2210150711341.jpg

     

    Did we really need to draw the teenage Carrie with nipples? It bugs me when artists do this for no good reason

    Artists known for their sexy women are going to (tend to) draw all women sexy. Even chubbies and non-humanoid aliens. And so? Much larger debate for other forums (fer sure), but until the post-WWII era, this idea of post-menses 'underage' didn't really exist. Presently it's just an arbitrary number chosen, a legal line in the sand, not as if there's some sort of magic that happens physically/mentally at age 16, 17, 18...the year the 'magic' happens all depending on which state you're in?? Not making any sort of argument on that subject here, just that it's not as big a deal to everyone as some folks might assume. We all know the average age that female menses begins...that is the real physical change signalling -at a minimum- physical maturity. The rest just follows.

     

    And before we bash up Biz too hard, maybe...somebody should mention to the parents of all those teens at the mall...they'd be doing their daughters a favor if they dressed them 'up' as much as even Carrie. Most wear much less. And tighter too. No matter what any of us thinks, the culture seems to be moving younger and younger, sexier and sexier, with little regard for the legalities (that aren't moving) or the fact that it seems people have very different opinions when it's their daughter on displays vs. "teenagers". Ya know?

     

    At least she isn't facing the other way :)

     

    I think the issue is more that Carrie Kelley is a very non-sexualized 13 year old in DKR. That's kind of rare in comics and it kinda takes away from the character to give her D-cups.

     

    Not that I care. For all I know, he could be drawing the character as she appears in DKIII. But I doubt it.

  8. The signing by midtown decreases the amount of potential blue labels by 2,000...sounds good to me

     

    Or maybe Midtown just increased their original order by 2K because they knew about the signing. Those copies might not even exist in another reality where BKV wouldn't sign for them. In that reality, the overall run on the book is 2K lower. lol

  9. IMHO this was the best DKR panel page Heritage has ever auctioned. It was very memorable from when I first read the page in issue #4. Like many others, I thought it would go for a silly number so I didn't focus on it and it wound up going fairly "cheap." Like many others, I wish I had a do over. I'd prefer this page to all of these DK III covers combined.

     

    http://comics.ha.com/itm/original-comic-art/frank-miller-and-klaus-janson-batman-the-dark-knight-returns-4-superman-vs-batman-page-40-original-art-dc-198/a/7059-92259.s?ic4=ListView-Thumbnail-071515

     

    I think we discussed this page on another thread about a year ago - the page is from one of my favorite sequences in comic history and that price was a steal.

  10. I hope the November then 6 issues monthly pans out so I can sell the last remaining copies of #1 from my spec pile at $20+ apiece again. :wishluck:

     

    Someone needs to start a movie or TV rumor as well......... hmlol

     

    So relieved I sold my thought bubble variant for over $350 before this started tanking.

     

    Believe it or not, someone sent me a PM on here telling me that it was going to be a 1k book months from when I sold it. ???

     

    Considering I sold multiple 9.8 copies at $700, that really wasn't far fetched at the time. It was on track to be another Saga RRP.

  11. Speaking of late comics, has bedlam been officially cancelled

     

    K, you should tweet Nick Spencer with that question, await a response and then come back to share it with us here (or the Bedlam thread if you can find it).

     

    He'll probably tell you it's coming back late this year. Just like it came back in late 2014. Also, I'm sure he'll insist that 11 issues in 36 months isn't really that bad. That's an issue every 90 days!!

  12. With DK3, which cover will prevail as the one that people remember most to the series and story more so than any scarcity or value?

     

    Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the variants are not incentive variants (e.g. 1:50, 1:100). They're store variants, so they're store specific. Most collectors will only see the regular cover on the stands, along with their store's variant (if their store got one).

     

     

    It's a mix of incentive variants at the usual tiers (including a Jim Lee original head sketch variant at something absurd like 1:2000) and retailer variants.

     

    DK III has passed the point of no return for variants and won't have any one memorable cover, except MAYBE the regular, IMO.

  13. Isn't this the 3rd time this series has been optioned for a TV show?

     

    While I love the series and think it would be fantastic to see it on the small screen, what makes this time any different than the other times? :shrug:

     

    I agree that any TV option is far from a sure thing, but I thought it was only optioned for a movie previously. I know the movie rights were tied up for ages before they reverted to Brian/Pia.