There is a difference, Sufunk, between considering PL members on a case-by-case basis, and disregarding the PL entirely.
It may seem a fine distinction, but it's an important one. If the latter, I would agree with you. But it's the former.
We don't throw out the american justice system just because some innocent people are convicted, and vice versa. We consider things on a case-by-case basis.
The people WERE on the PL list though. Saying someone was convicted but you dont consider them a convicted felon or someone found not guilty is actually a felon would be a more accurate analogy (thumbs u
Again though, what is the point of even nominating someone for the PL especially under these circumstances if thats your stance. Like i said before, i'm on your side on this one not selling to him but why even do the nomination if you believe people should look at each PL member on a case by case basis considering how many people have responded that they think you SHOULD sell him the book?