• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

MR SigS

Member
  • Posts

    10,572
  • Joined

Everything posted by MR SigS

  1. Issues 1, 2, 4-6 Mike Royer's file copies (he doesn't bag/board his fc's ). I found the pages from #4 at SDCC 2017.
  2. +1 I thought the first was great, and feel the sequel undermined the character development it and her other film appearances accomplished by making young Diana a 'Mary Sue' (sorry if that term is frowned upon, but the shoe fits).
  3. I heard that one of the "alternate endings" that was shot shows her in a montage of iconic "Indiana Jones" moments, basically rewriting canon and claiming the "history" as her own.
  4. They just rehired the man that started them down this current path to finish the job.
  5. This is the main reason I'm in no hurry to see this film. Of course, even if they did recast the role, that would have brought about some backlash as well.
  6. I meant outnumbering people interested in Atlantis that otherwise would not see a Marvel film.
  7. That's fine, and I don't think you need to change your mind if that's how you see it, but apparently Marvel thought it was a big enough deal that they had to change it. I think that's a shame because the idea of Atlantis and its citizens and the history offered far more creative writing than, "Vibranium did it to them," and it would have pleased all or at least most fans. I doubt any real fan felt the need for a change, and I suspect anyone who did didn't even know who Namor was prior to the $uperhero film boom. These are opinions. The Atlantis mythology has been fascinating to a great many for centuries and keeping to that origin may even have tempted some of those people into a theater. But they're likely outnumbered by the very vocal people who need these changes to be made in order to enjoy a Marvel film as most of us have been able to do prior to phase 4.
  8. I never claimed she or anyone else said anything. I asked which body part they targeted when they did whatever they did.
  9. Correct. I've read and heard comments stating it was his back they were focusing on when doing whatever they did to dry him out. If it was not his back they targeted, but some other body part, then I stand corrected. Was it his back, or elsewhere? Emerging from a river to breach the wall of a country meant to keep outsiders from entering, then having their back dried off (if that is what they did), sounds like a stereotype IMO. It feels right up there with the pair of shoes dangling from a Harlem power line in "What If Miles Morales was Thor?"
  10. I don't recall any stories about weakening him by specifically focusing on drying his back, but I haven't read them all.
  11. I hear that in the film he's seen emerging from a river before attempting to breach the wall of the greatest nation in the (MCU) world. Disney loves those cultural stereotypes.
  12. I got this some time ago but had no image. It upgrades my foxing-freckled reader.
  13. Lobo and Logan disagree on cigar brands. Inked and on its way.
  14. On sale items? I obscure my cert# so no one uses my images in their scam (which someone has done twice with my AF15, before I started doing this). Since I don't sell comics (yet) it doesn't matter to me that no one can check the cert#. If I ever do sell them, naturally the label will be shown because I can't imagine anyone buying a slab with the # they can't check.