• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Juno Beach

Member
  • Posts

    1,040
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Juno Beach

  1. On 08/04/2018 at 11:20 PM, Ken Aldred said:

    The second, Arthur Adams version.

    Also, it looks like it's in mintier condition, lacking obvious creases and fading.

    Easy to get a nicer copy of item A.

    It's a print, not an actual comic

  2. 1 minute ago, Vietnam67 said:

    Care about Fraud? Are you serious? 90 percent of items sold on E bay is forgery! the point I was trying to make with Johnson was: Stop worrying about some clown supposedly selling signed forgeries of Stan Lee. 

    Yes, you've said this numerous times in this thread. You wouldn't happen to be the seller, would you?

  3. On 12/13/2017 at 4:20 PM, cbaileypacker said:

     

    I was more concerned with this guy, who claims he marks his books with a pen or sharpie, in a "secret spot" that cgc never catches, so he knows he gets his books back, not swapped out for a different book. 

    claims he gets 9.8 every time, and they never catch his re-marking.

    This dude is ridiculous.

    5a31c2b227c77_facbookpost1.jpg.cbbd51315f2a724971b2a190b0cb9701.jpg

    He should supply pics of his marked books if he's making a claim like this. 

  4. 13 minutes ago, Quicksilver Signs said:

    Are any Disney superhero movies memorable? There are no stakes or drama, you KNOW the hero will prevail and be back for a sequel. Spoiler alert: the Avengers will beat Thanos with minimal casualties. They’re great popcorn fare and a good way to get out but  not sure any would be in my top 20 of great movies. Recently, Fox with Deadpool and Logan are the ones that stand out imo.

    Yes. 

    So you too would rather bad movies to Disney movies?

  5. On 10/2/2017 at 9:43 PM, ninanina said:

    Klingons investigating the sister ship before Discovery arrives and its as well as Discovery's mission; a direct result of the war.

    This is NOT Gene's  Roddenberry's Star Trek. Much darker than any and all of the previous  series. If Gene was still alive, I'm not sure all of it would have been allowed. Most specifically (for example) panning the distorted bodies in the corridor. In any of the original series or the movies for that matter, they could talk about it but they wouldn't show it. Remember how they handled the transporter malfunction in the first movie? They never showed the bodies after they materialized.

    Also, I didn't know they had site to site transport 10 years before the first series. It could be an indication they are taking certain liberties with the history. Anyone else catch that? Or is it something that I simply imagined in the 3rd episode.

    Love the show.

    Didn't they explain that the Klingons probably just found a derelict Federation ship and boarded it?