He's just trying to state that it's been going on for 10 years or more. The outrage now are but faint embers, and if justified , past due. He's pointing out that this is being late to the party, and how is it cgc should take sole responsibility for a 10+ year business practice. That is cgc being late to the party as well, so they thought it over, this wasn't a whim. I wouldn't be surprised if done before is the person's post.
That's not getting in a huff, it's relevant when no one seems to know about it, and they seem to be taking it as new information.