• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

BronzeBruce13

Member
  • Posts

    6,237
  • Joined

Posts posted by BronzeBruce13

  1. Amazing Adventures 11 CGC 9.8 White Pages... $14,995 + (S/I)

    *There hasn't been a recorded GPA Sale since 2015.

    There are only (7) 9.8s in the census after 20 years of grading... and 852 submitted copies.

    With Disney/Marvel Studios reacquiring the X-Men Franchise, this issue (along with other X-Men keys frankly) could easily skyrocket to new heights. If the "Furry Beast" is used, I may regret selling.

    Serious offers only please. I'm not willing to move much at this time.

    AmazingAdventure11CGC98W_FC.jpg

    AmazingAdventure11CGC98W_RC.jpg

  2. Forever People 1 CGC 9.0 White Pages... $225 + (S/I)

    *TBH, I expected a better grade on this one although I don't disagree strongly with the grade in hindsight (if grading is tighter). The grading notes haven't posted, but there are 2 fiber-breaking creases at the bottom edge of the back cover which are difficult to see. In any event, the nicest 9.0 you could ask for.

    ForeverPeople1CGC90W_FC.jpg

    ForeverPeople1CGC90W_RC.jpg

  3. Hello Forumites!,

    I haven't sold here in a while, but figured I'd offer some of my New Slabs directly to potential buyers for a short time before listing them on a consignment site or Ebay.

    I'm offering these books at prices that are less than I'd accept at other sales venues. So, if you're in the market for any of these books, you'll do better here than once they are listed with a 10% fee, etc.

    UPDATE: Sale Ends Friday, March 20th at 1pm EST

     

    Sales Conditions/Rules:

    :takeit: in the thread or by PM wins and trumps any negotiations. I'm open to reasonable counter-offers, especially if multiple items are desired, but am not open to trades.

    • No members of the Hall of Shame or Probation List please.

    • I ship USPS Priority and require full insurance and signature confirmation. It is not included in my ask price and will be determined based on your location and purchase (without a handling charge or profit). If you have a Fed-Ex or UPS account and your own private insurance, of course we can go that route instead.

    • I pack very securely with appropriate packing materials. I don't take any chances with shipping. Check my Kudos thread... BronzeBruce13 Kudos!

    • No International shipping for these items at this time due to the increased uncertainty and reliability of international shipping right now.

    • PayPal (goods and services), Cashiers Checks/Money Orders, and Personal Checks accepted (PCs need to clear before shipping).

    No Returns on CGC-graded comic books.

    • Consider all books pressed.

     

     

  4. 17 minutes ago, fantastic_four said:

    Yes, but why avoid showing his face before that?  Consistently throughout the episode you always saw him either from behind or from the neck down before he transformed into Cal.  You could hear the voice of another actor but you never saw his face.

    I was also wondering this but perhaps he thought having multiple facial characteristics would confuse the viewer, or if not, it eliminates another actor from having to play the role briefly and have little else to contribute. Maybe, if he survives, comes back, etc. he will always retain Cals appearance for Angela. It also added a little build up and mystery before we see him... for whatever that was worth.

    Btw... loved the Leftovers (underrated and unique) and Prometheus. Lost... hated the last couple seasons and especially the ending.

  5. 24 minutes ago, fantastic_four said:

    I don't get the entire idea of Manhattan being able to see all points in time.  If you can see the future you can change it, so how would he ever be able to see only a single outcome, and why was he resigned to the idea that there was nothing he could do to prevent himself from getting captured?  Seems like all he had to do in that scene was destroy the vehicle with the quantum cannon on it and boom, outcome averted.  ???

    That's what I was thinking. How could he not change the outcome. He could have also just left to anywhere

  6. 7 hours ago, James J Johnson said:

    Can't George's systems gather ComicLink's sales data and compile it, with or without permission needed to be asked? It's public information, right? Can't the same be said for Hake's, Connect's, Heritage's, eBay's or any other sales venue where results are made public?

    Did George need to ask ebay for permission to compile their seller's listing's results? Why should he need permission if it's readily accessible to all in the public domain?

    Technically "yes". And, I believe (I don't know for sure anymore, haven't asked recently) that George had been collecting all CL auction data in the event someday Josh decided he wanted to participate in GPA. But, obviously none of that data, should he still have it/collect it, is offered in GPA and won't be unless Josh agrees to join.

    George and I both tried to recruit Josh/ComicLink many years back to report his exchange and auction data to GPA. He felt similarly to Bob, that his data was worth something. He also wasn't interested (at that time anyway) of reporting ALL his sales. I don't want to speak in too much detail as to some of Josh's other thoughts and positions on the matter as it was a private conversation firstly and secondly it has been many years and I don't want to misquote or misrepresent anything that was discussed. That said, Josh didn't want ComicLink mined for data for GPA and as a courtesy George respected his wishes... regardless if it was legal to do so anyway. It would be nice to have ComicLink and HighGradeComics on board too, but they have their reasons.

    Bottom line, as I mentioned in a comment to Bob, if GPA had to pay anyone for their data, he'd likely then have to pay most everyone (except Ebay). In that scenario, how much would the GPA service then have to be priced at to cover those expenses?... $25, $30, $35 per month. It isn't a viable business model I think we'd all agree. I'd still pay for it as would many dealers and those that rely on that info for a living, but many, many more subscribers simply couldn't afford to and the service would fail.

  7. 15 minutes ago, blazingbob said:

    I agree with this.  GPA probably reports a much stronger percentage of the Public Auction market then 40% but probably less then 10% of Dealer/private CGC transactions.  Which makes GPA a very strong tool to track auction sales but very weak when it comes to what the rest of the seller universe is doing.  Now while a response could be "Well report your sales to GPA and increase that number" my response would be "Why would I give business knowledge away for free" to a company that makes money off it?

    I get that Bob, and Josh apparently agrees... although there are other concerns in his reluctance I won't get in to. I'm not sure what GPA would have to charge its subscribers if it had to pay each venue for their data though... $25-30 a month? Probably not viable. I've heard you routinely eclipse GPA figures for early ASMs and FFs... so, I understand your position. That said, if you reported your sales, I'm guessing at a minimum a multitude of early ASM and FF CGC owners would be grateful that their books were worth more due to your ability to set the market and move those books at higher numbers. 

  8. 20 minutes ago, Jaylam said:

    I was thinking along these lines.... are sales between members here on the boards reported, are sales from online or brick and mortar stores that are not auction houses reported, are sales at the many conventions reported, are sales between me and my neighbor reported? If you consider all the transactions that are falling outside what GPA is reporting, 40% may be pretty generous. Is there any way to know for sure, probably not!

    Ah, I see your point better now. That makes sense. What those transactions represent I could only guess.

  9. 4 hours ago, Jaylam said:

    Still, the information given only represents a part of the whole picture. All sales are not reported on the GPA. I would dare say the GPA data may represent about 40% of total sales if that (and yes I’m just pulling that number out of my @$$, but considerIng the number of sale venues that aren’t reported...).

    A real and meaningful improvement would have been for them to attempt to have more inclusive sales data, even including Voldemort.

    I could be missing something, but as far as I'm aware, out of all the major auction venues only ComicLink is not interested in reporting their sales to GPA. I'm confident that GPA is gathering a much higher perentage of CGC sales than 40%. 

    As for the competition, GPA and CGC have been working together closely for many years... and that relationship will remain exclusive, so that's not an option. There are also some interesting new features being discussed for the future involving both companies... but, first things first of course. Some things need to be, and will be tweaked. 

  10. 4 hours ago, blazingbob said:

    John, 

    When you uncheck the filters they do stay off as you navigate from book to book.  However if you logoff those filter choices are not saved.  I should have the option of having the default settings or mine.  Just a suggeston to George.

    As mentioned above Bob, this was my #1 request during beta testing. Apparently it was not an oft requested change with other beta testers as it didn't get done. That said as per my convo with George he is now working with his developers to institute this along with trying to find a way to make the graphs part of those choices as well.

    Expanding on the post I made about what I liked and didn't when testing... among my likes I mentioned (Filtering option and ease of jumping between issues of a same title). I forgot to mention how thrilled I was how the new site worked on the phone. Its light years better than the old GPA app which was severely limited. And, if you instead accessed the full old website, there was a lot of scrolling and reducing the size to see the data. I'm not sure how this change isn't being talked about as an obvious upgrade over the previous options.

  11. 13 minutes ago, Logan510 said:

    Don’t get your pants caught in the chain :baiting:

    Not sure what that' supposed to mean.

    Addressing your previous post... of course its perfectly ok to offer constructive criticism for a product you pay for. I didn't suggest otherwise. I just asked for a little slack mostly relating to the harsher toned comments and also criticisms that were not even GPA's fault. One friend complained he didn't get his password change email and no contacts after several contacts... only to find out he changed his email and forgot, so yeah... he didn't get the email. I just helped him get in touch with George and it was fixed immediately. Also, some people got very nasty and he's my friend. So, I don't like it. Much of the good feedback here is going to be either implemented or considered. That shows some dedication to what the customer wants I think.

    Edit: I did indeed suggest the people stealing it should STFU.

  12. Just now, ADAMANTIUM said:

    That makes sense. I figured they were honest to be worth their salt, but I wonder how much "they" correlate to those users here. Is there anywhere to read these reviews? Is a thing like that even possible? :shy:

    My only insight is I've prescreened movies and am asked for my opinion afterward.....

    If you doubt what I said, doubt it. I'm sure George is not going to publish all the feedback to prove it... he has more important things to do. Believe what you wish. I took the beta testing to heart and offered everything I saw or could think of that would improve it.

  13. 3 minutes ago, ADAMANTIUM said:

    This.

    And imo, It makes more sense now that there is a list of who gave feedback... whether personal friends or not, it was beta tested and approved somehow. Didn't happen overnight. Maybe those in the beta test were so happy to be chosen they didn't feel to be too critical.

    I would be, personal flaws and all, Dave and Adams just gave me a coupon from regularly but g, so what did I do? Used the coupon and gave glowing reviews :roflmao:

     

     

    No, I took the job very seriously. I found several bugs in the process and made many recommendations. A few implemented, some not. Most of the beta testers were not "dear friends". A lot of feedback was divided.

    I also didn't experience much of a lag if any. I didn't love the placement of the individual data and had some suggestions, but I did not find the extra click so horrible. Instead I was intrigued by the filter feature and the ease in which I could jump to a different issue in a title. But, that's just me.