• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

valiantman

Member
  • Posts

    14,448
  • Joined

Posts posted by valiantman

  1. On 8/17/2023 at 10:01 AM, Bronty said:
    On 8/17/2023 at 12:44 AM, valiantman said:

    Just checking... if it hammered at $66K, then the buyer paid $79.2K to Heritage (with Buyer's Premium) and Heritage sent you $55K, correct?  If so, you got 70% of the buyer's payment and Heritage got 30%.

    I think he's confused on the usage of the 'hammer price' term.

    You can get SP waived with big enough aggregate consignments.

    So if something hammers at 55k, its 66 with the juice, and HA sends you a check for 55.

    Fees are 1/6 of the all-in price, or 16.66% which he's rounding to 17%.

    Right. So if the "hammer price" (Heritage price before the buyer has to pay another 20%) was $66K, then the buyer paid $79.2K.

    If the "hammer price" was $55K (Heritage price before the buyer has to pay another 20%), and then he received a check for $55K, then it sounds like the buyer paid $66K (which is $55K + 20%), so his seller fee to Heritage was waived completed (0%).

    Either way, it's good information, but they are two different scenarios.

  2. On 8/17/2023 at 12:42 AM, Telegan said:

    lol.  Yes.  I think part of the problem is the last sale they have of the 6.0 is from January when dozens of copies have sold since then and the price has been dropping.  So maybe it's more the actual collection of data rather than whatever algorithm they use for FMV - who knows.  You'll see this often on the site.  FYI : a 4.0 graded FMV is listed as $169 for the same issue.

     

    image.png.2a24cf589591d199c4900030c5afcf23.png

    Seems like they could drop the middle column, then, if they're just reporting the most recent sale by grade.  Having the middle column as "Fair Market Value" is pretty ridiculous when there's no way it makes any sense (and their algorithm doesn't fix it).

  3. On 8/15/2023 at 7:13 AM, GM8 said:

    That sounds high. I sold a 9.6 through Heritage and it hammered at 66K. My cut was 55K, so 11K in fees or 17% of the full hammer price.

    Just checking... if it hammered at $66K, then the buyer paid $79.2K to Heritage (with Buyer's Premium) and Heritage sent you $55K, correct?  If so, you got 70% of the buyer's payment and Heritage got 30%.

  4. On 8/17/2023 at 12:03 AM, Telegan said:

    You can see some of this in their FMV for a 6.5 currently, which is $119 and the FMV for a 6.0 is $206.

    Is this a real example? 

    "Hey boss, how much is this comic?  $206.  OK, what about the better copy of the same issue?  $119."

    Boss is off his meds.

  5. I don't know if this is accurate, but it is logical:

    - 25 books pre-screened for CGC 9.6

    - Grader looks at all 25 books and quickly rules out 10 which won't be CGC 9.6 because it's easy to see (10 are charged pre-screen fee only)

    - 15 books are graded in more detail, and 13 of those do receive CGC 9.6 or higher (13 are charged grading fee, 2 are charged pre-screen fee only)

    - Result: 13 books charged a grading fee, 12 books charged a pre-screen fee

    If the pre-screener is also the grader, then there might be a possibility that "borderline" books get awarded the pre-screen grade since they are human and the book was on the border between 9.6/9.4.

    If the pre-screener is not the grader, then the grader should only grade the already-screened books "as is" and the encapsulation should reject any that don't meet the minimum, putting them with the other rejects.

    I doubt if there's any reason that books that aren't on the border between grades would be bumped up to the pre-screen grade more often than something is overlooked on books that aren't pre-screened.

    .Errors occur, but I don't know why they would be specific to pre-screening.

  6. On 8/4/2023 at 4:27 PM, Cat said:

    61. First Appearance of Golden Age Starman (Ted Knight) in Adventure Comics #61. A very important character for many reasons. Joined the JSA in the same issue as Wonder Woman, without him there'd be no Jack Knight, a critically acclaimed series from the 90's. A much bigger character than at first it might appear. 

    Superman #61 has 1st Kryptonite :foryou:

  7. On 8/4/2023 at 1:56 PM, Axelrod said:

    Since you didn't have anything for #30 yet, I just spent a little bit of time scanning series to see.

    Superman #30 - first appearance of Mr. Mxyzptlk - is the best I have come up with so far.

    Possibly a case could be made for Funnies #30 (1939) - CGC notes it as "1st appearance & origin of John Carter of Mars"

  8. I just saw this topic back at the top of the Modern Age category and thought, "That Bone topic should be in Copper Age", but then I noticed this topic was started in 2008.  Weird that Bone #1 was 17 years old when this topic started and it's 32 years old now. It was "Modern" when it started, but now it's approaching "Middle Age". lol

  9. On 8/3/2023 at 2:35 PM, PopKulture said:

    Adventure 40 - first Sandman and a rare book.  hm

    Sandman from New York World's Fair 1939 says "What?!?" :whatthe:

    On 8/3/2023 at 3:19 PM, Ken Aldred said:

    Thought of that one, but also thought someone might counter with New York World's Fair 1. Maybe.

    lol

  10. I tried doing this list a few years ago based on the "Most Submitted to CGC" but the majority of 1 - 100 were Amazing Spider-Man and it wasn't very interesting.  Identifying "interesting" books like Albedo #2 or Whiz #2 makes more sense than just setting #2 to Wolverine Limited Series #2 (1982) because it has been submitted most often.

    Enjoy!

  11. That's very strange because the CGC Census does not have any graded copies of Terminator #12 Newsstand Edition.  The only way that slot would work for the CGC Registry is that they're checking the Pedigree information for the "Newsstand Edition" notation which isn't on the CGC Census (yet).

    http://www.cgcdata.com/cgc/search/publisher/:Now:/title/:Terminator:/desc/no/label/all/orderby/year/variants/yes/census/230725/

  12. On 8/1/2023 at 2:09 PM, fantastic_four said:

    So he already had Extremis DNA in addition to Groot's DNA mixed with his own before that final episode.

    I think I missed it--how did he have some of "the Harvest," but not all of it?  Was that addressed at some point?

    I think he was told that he was getting "the Harvest" from one of the earlier Skrull raids/heists but it wasn't the full Harvest. Fury had hidden the real Harvest and so Gravik first only had the "decoy DNA" that only contained a couple of other known powers, not the full set. I'm not sure though, maybe the Skrulls went to the Infinity War/Endgame battle field(s) and did their own dirt-DNA extractions.