• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

ExNihilo

Member
  • Posts

    3,592
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ExNihilo

  1. On 6/22/2023 at 8:06 PM, DougC said:

    Worse, all of this could very well be moot as on 3/28/23 HR LLC filed for DISSOLUTION in Oregon

    Not a lawyer, but I'm interpreting this to mean that Mike's personal assets are no longer separate/protected from the business and that if anyone were to sue and win, they would have a legal right to garner wages or whatever else until payment is made?  Whereas if the business entity still existed, participants in any legal action would only be able to recoup up to whatever value remained of the business?  I mean, if a business is dissolved, isn't the resolution of business part of that dissolution (ie the return of assets)?  Somehow that makes this seem all the more messy.

  2. On 6/22/2023 at 9:13 AM, fsumavila said:

    Anyone have their sights set on any items in  Day 1 of the auction? 
    I'm just observing today; tracking a couple smaller pieces that go up on Sunday.

    particularly interested to see where that Kamandi Kirby splash ends up ...

    There's stuff I'd like (Jim Lee Hush cover), but nothing I could realistically win, so i'm just an observer.

  3. On 6/21/2023 at 2:23 PM, Flanders82 said:

    Not yet. I confirmed with @Hero Restoration that they're planning on it, but it will take a couple years because of the current workload. 

    Can't tell if this is serious or a joke (the cease and desist part), but even if they did, there's no actual basis for it.  CGC is a platform that allows for discussions.  It's not like CGC is the ones actually saying anything negative here.  It's just people having water cooler talk and leaving reviews.

    All seriousness aside, the last thing Hero needs is bloodsucking lawyers.  

    Coi21ywUEAAQ467.jpg

  4. On 6/20/2023 at 2:23 PM, rumrunner71 said:

    I think having this thread preserved for posterity does more than the PL. Isn't the PL just for buyers and sellers? 

    The thread would still exist, the PL would just be more of a formality.  I forget where, but I thought at one point transactions that occurred outside the boards still qualified for the PL, but I can't seem to find that verbiage in the PL Discussion Thread.

  5. On 6/20/2023 at 11:40 AM, L'Angelo Misterioso said:

    Lol at people early in this thread's development giving Mike the benefit of the doubt

    The guy had a heart attack.  I try to be neutral and sympathetic in such situations.  Or at least give the benefit of the doubt.  But his ensuing commentary and inaction just kinda throws all that out the door.  I'm wondering, at what point does this qualify for the Probation List?  Or is the PL off the table since the seller has shown they are working on books?  Albeit...EXTREMELY slowly.

  6. On 6/2/2023 at 3:36 PM, Bronty said:

    I think lots of different people bid things up early for lots of different reasons.   Many times it’s likely innocent.    Sometimes it’s likely not.    Ultimately the same holds true for any venue . 

    I don't bid on OA that much so take what I have to say with a heavy dose of salt.  With that out of the way, I've participated in open auctions (for comic books) where my bid is known to the rest of the potential bidding pool.  I'll have a rough idea of what I believe market to be and so sometimes I'll just throw down the hammer and bid just below market such that the auction price will jump from $1 to $1000 as opposed to the steady increase of prices that we all know are likely to be outbid.  I think some bidders have a "in for a penny, in for a pound" mentality and so if you creep up in $25/$100/$1000 (whatever) increments, people just think "what's another $25?" or they become more stubborn in wanting to win a particular piece.  So by skipping the small talk "so to speak", I'm hoping to weed out buyers that might otherwise have a competitive bidding mindset.  Obviously the serious bidders will up the amount, but I'd rather reduce the pool of bidders right out the gate.  Obviously, this doesn't apply in silent auctions where the auction price increases incrementally based on everyone's maximum bids.

    That all being said, if you all could just ignore the lots that i'm interested in, that'd be greatly appreciated.  :P

  7. On 6/11/2023 at 12:11 PM, mjoeyoung said:

    Star Wars is a different story.  Paid $4B in 2012, movies have only earned $4.8B. Plus, they spent approximately $2B to build a Galaxy's Edge (Star Wars Land) in Florida and California and $350M to build the now closed Galactic Starcruiser hotel.  They miscalculated that the new characters would be as beloved as Han Solo, etc.  When I went on the main ride in the park (Rise of the Resistance), I could not help but think the ride would have been much scarier with Darth Vader instead of Kylo Ren as the antagonist.

    I'm a fan of the parks.  Rise of the Resistance is a brilliant attraction.  You're the first person I've heard levy criticism towards the ride story/characters.  Conversely, I've spoken with friends who take their kids to Disneyland and don't care about Star Wars and are blown away by it.  Maybe it would have resonated with the older generation more seeing familiar faces that the entire fan base cares about, but the ride is so good it makes a lot of people forget about such things.

    Starcruiser was doomed to fail from the start given the price of a stay and not to mention I'm just not sure how many guests are interested in LARPing.

    That all said, I imagine the franchise made back the $4B years ago.  Galaxy's Edge increased park capacity at both parks.  On top of that, there's merch sales.  Just think about all the booked reservations at the Droid Depot and Lightsaber building experience.  Or all the $250 legacy sabers that are sold.

    The problem for them currently is Fox, ESPN, and Disney+.

  8. On 6/14/2023 at 9:28 AM, Dr. Balls said:

    in the sense that they've been hooked for a premium price, and if they want to sell, they're taking a heavy loss.

    That sounds more like a speculator than a collector.

    I'm reaching a point, and perhaps it's space constraints, where I'm increasingly thinking of stopping collecting because the quality of content isn't captivating.  I can understand why people collect omni's/tpb's because you can wait to see if a run is critically acclaimed before buying/reading it.  I'm starting to think it's cheaper to wait to buy floppies after the fact than to subscribe to a dozen series each month and hoping one of them turns out to be good.

  9. It's a little sus that the book released in July 2018 and Stan passed in December 2018.  It's possible Stan signed the book in those 5 months.  That's a fairly legible Stan signature for that time of his life.  But I'm more inclined to believe that CGC messed up and instead of assigning a yellow/green label, somehow completely overlooked Stan's signature.  The thing I hate is that book got past the grader and quality control (though that assumes there's a QC department to begin with) without anyone notifying the slabbing department.

  10. On 6/13/2023 at 11:47 AM, thehumantorch said:

    If you take too long to create a post it seems to go poof.  

    On desktop, it seems to remember for quite a while.  I've returned to old posts where apparently I started writing a comment and never submitted, only for that to still be there the next time I clicked on the topic.  I'm talking months.  Phone is a different story.  I couldn't imagine navigating this site on a small screen like that.