theCapraAegagrus

"Hello, I'd like to return this CGC'd comic that you sold me..."

With WW84 regressing to CM's standards, maybe The Marvels will live up to WW17's standards...? Criss-cross apple sauce?

The bold is funny, but yes, your statement is true (unless you use conservation and/or restoration methods). @lostboys's analogy to the human body is astute.

Wonder Woman: Wayne Gretzky Captain Marvel: Brent Gretzky

Do you know what the CCS pressing TAT was when you submitted your order?

For example, Wonder Woman was released 1 year earlier and was a tremendous success. One could even say that the great writing of her film set a precedent that Captain Marvel did not come close to matching.

My pessimism to this occurring in The Marvels is the fact that Photon was very poorly done in WandaVision. You have 2 characters that need to be 'fixed'.

Thankfully, female fans of the MCU are smarter than Marvel Studios initially gave them credit, and generally recognize the mediocrity of the character's current list of performances. Changing it from a solo sequel to a team-up makes it seem like they recognize that there must be a better job done writing the character and/or surrounding her with a better environment to succeed. I think that we would all enjoy a well-done version of Captain Marvel, kinda how we enjoyed the excellent job done by DC with Wonder Woman (though DC made a Captain Marvel mistake with WW84). Good writing sells characters.

No. It's not stupid, they simply have not stood the test of time. Also, it's a comment from December 16th.

9.0 range.

9.4 range.

9.0+ IMO.

9.0+ IMO.

9.0+ IMO.

3.5 IMO.

3.0 IMO.

8.5 IMO.

7.0 IMO.

3.0 IMO.

9.0+ IMO.

9.0 range.

9.4 range.

8.5 IMO.

1.5 IMO.