theCapraAegagrus

CGC doesn't grade toys.

Basicallyyyyyyyy... Pressing pre-screen is for people who aren't well-educated on press-able defects. If you have money to burn - why not?

Such a fantastic movie. It really is too bad that the conclusion with Ares is just a mess of CGI. Drags down the overall excellence of the film.

Oh. My. ing. Lord...

Loki escaping with the Tesseract, in Endgame, created a new branch in the multiverse. He took the Tesseract from Odin's vault in Ragnarok. That's how he had it to begin Infinity War.

'Tis not.

You believe in one implied relationship built off-screen, but not another. That's cherry-picking for confirmation bias.

Riiiiiiiiiight. We don't see Romanoff and Barton's evident relationship until Film 22. Except for the fact that Natasha drops everything at the hint of Clint in trouble at the beginning of The Avengers. Danvers' and Fury's relationship is so meaningful and deep that she leaves the planet for 25 consecutive years and has nothing to do with him... Wow. What a deep connection. This perfectly sums up your perspective on the MCU and Captain Marvel:

There's evidence of deep bias here when you claim that CM has magically conjured character relationships 20 movies deep into a franchise that has thrived on character relationships (especially when the "relationships" are virtually non-existent in the majority of CM's own movie). It doesn't make any sense. You contradict yourself, especially, when you mention that there's 'distrust at first' that's amended. Are you completely overlooking every single other MCU film that has accomplished this? Mainly The Avengers (a group that Carol Danvers ain't even a part of - so much for being a 'team player' with "relationships"). Rocket offering his hand to Nebula was more convincing than Carol pretending to tear-up about Fury.

If you don't really want it, I'll take it off your hands...

Didn't Pacific Rim pertain to multiple dimensions?

Daredevil isn't "super", either.

CIP is a real human condition, though. Not "super" enough.

I was being hyperbolic. I split the difference between "market" value, and my own personal value ($0). I may have skewed it one direction more than another...

Holy . This is one of the best posts that I have ever read!

Comic: 7.5ish IMO. Tape: 0.5

Don't hold your breath...

That dingus either meant the "comic book film industry" or the film industry as a whole. Or they could be less-artarded and just incapable of conveying their thoughts correctly. Either way: Grade-A dingus.

I define "superhero" as someone with super powers or abilities. So, Batman isn't a superhero. He's just peak human intelligence and physical condition. Kick-A** is a hero movie. Not superhero, though.

Meh, it's 'good', but it's not a superhero movie. I'm not gonna "want to abolish VFX from the industry" just because some non-super hero movies work. Y'know?

At least I can read it...

Again: lolwut Take the blinders off, bud. The grandstanding cherry-picking argument doesn't dispel the truth.

3.5 IMO.