• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

theCapraAegagrus

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    28,429

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Everything posted by theCapraAegagrus

  1. theCapraAegagrus
    Insides (story): Gem Mint. Outside condition: 9.4 IMO. I have a TDKR SS that has pretty much that exact same corner condition that's graded CGC NM.
  2. theCapraAegagrus
    9.0+ IMO.
  3. theCapraAegagrus
    Damn rodents! 3.0 IMO.
  4. theCapraAegagrus
    Gotta agree. 3.5 IMO.
  5. theCapraAegagrus
    I don't grade for fun! A 4.5 IMO.
  6. theCapraAegagrus
    When you said "extensive" I did not know you meant "blown to smithereens"... Very nice comics, though! CGC will make it right.
  7. theCapraAegagrus
    Suicide Squad was on TV yesterday. It's so ing awful. What "weapon" was Enchantress even 'making'? Yes, I saw it in theaters, but hadn't watched it since then. My awe in its awfulness is just reawakened.
  8. theCapraAegagrus
  9. theCapraAegagrus
    Stan Lee's final cameo was in Endgame. Which I think was appropriate.
  10. theCapraAegagrus
    I'll add you to the list of "good guys".
  11. theCapraAegagrus
    Do you have any examples? I personally haven't seen any differences that I would consider "substantial". I also don't look at much Golden Age, though. I would think that by default all Moderns would be "substantial" because IMO someone would have to be stupid to purchase any PQ below "White" for a Modern. I don't think that's really applicable to this particular discussion.
  12. theCapraAegagrus
  13. theCapraAegagrus
  14. theCapraAegagrus
    No.
  15. theCapraAegagrus
    4.5 IMO.
  16. theCapraAegagrus
    I know there are at least some people who watch South Park around here...
  17. theCapraAegagrus
    How dare you. I do not have ED.
  18. theCapraAegagrus
    I was, uh, channeling Mr. Mackey...
  19. theCapraAegagrus
    "The New Batman" is the name of the topic...
  20. theCapraAegagrus
    I thought you were trying to trigger me regarding Pattinson...
  21. theCapraAegagrus
    Rough edges. 3.0 IMO.
  22. theCapraAegagrus
  23. theCapraAegagrus
    Into the Spider-Verse is not a live action film. Marvel Studios does not share the rights to Sony Animated. I thought that much would be 100% transparent. Voice acting is not being cast to completely portray a character... The deal gives shared rights to Peter Parker's Spider-Man. So, if Marvel Studios wanted, they can allow/agree Sony to use Tom Holland and Peter Parker in their cinematic universe. He's a shared character. Kinda like, y'know, shared custody? Peter Parker cannot be used by Sony unless agreed to by both parties. How do the villains work? Do they all meet up say, "Sony, you have Venom, we'll use Mysterio etc etc etc"?
  24. theCapraAegagrus
    You laughed. Don't play me, bro.
  25. theCapraAegagrus