-
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
LordRahl
Member-
Posts
7,198 -
Joined
Content Type
Forums
CGC Journals
Gallery
Events
Store
Everything posted by LordRahl
-
You are correct in that I doubt CGC will make a statement on that. In my experience, and I've cracked a lot of books, it's somewhat dependent on the individual holder itself. Especially with the 1st gen holders. Some are extremely easy to open and leave no evidence of it (or very little if you are really looking) and others not so much. While I basically just completely destroy the current gen of slab when I break into them, I suspect the same will be true if using the methods described on youtube. Some will show little to no evidence and others will be obvious.
-
I know you're not actually this dense. They named him AFTER they won a court case, which would have then been public record anyway. You are asking them to name the guy NOW, which is looooong before any sort of court case has even started, let alone concluded with a decision in CGC's favor. Totally the same thing, right?
-
2024 CGC Grading Contest Season 3 Winter Edition #9 Sign up thread
LordRahl replied to CGC Mike's topic in Comics General
The last contest I participated in was a "guess the grade on this low and/or mid grade Golden Age book" with at least half of the books falling in this category. I commented on it during the contest asking why it was so heavily skewed towards this although there are plenty of other ages and grade ranges that were not well represented. I was naturally told to shut it so I did. As I have no interest in guessing the grade on low/mid GA, I'm choosing not to participate in future contests. I know I will get skewered for this post and debated on whether to even bother posting it but since the recruitment is being brought up in multiple threads, I thought I'd give you my perspective on why participation may be lower than usual. -
No, no, not at all. The poster I was responding to was suggesting that the owners of the tainted books not take up CGC on their review and recertify option but rather send the books in as "evidence" for the prosecution. In which case those books would be stuck in limbo while the process of investigating, indicting and prosecuting plays out. That would take likely years with the owners not having either the book or the money for the book while they wait for everything to play out. I'm just saying that no one will sign up for that and it's a terrible suggestion.
-
So you seem to have some idea of how long this could take, assuming the FBI even decided to prosecute AND your advice to the owners is to just send their books in and wait for what could be years? Wild!!! I assume you would be the first one to send in a $10K+ book and just wait years in limbo while the process plays out
-
Maybe I'm missing something here but how would CGC or anyone else for that matter know what this list is? I believe you can look up past ebay sales for only a few months. Or is there some way I don't know of to see what an ebay account has sold for years in the past? Other than a law enforcement agency subpoenaing ebay's records that is.
-
Do you care about some random stranger more than you do about yourself? If you could do something that is detrimental to you but beneficial for said random stranger, would you? I don't know what kind of fairy tale world you all live in but posts like this continue to amaze me. Unrealistic is putting it mildly.