• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

The Green Ghost

Member
  • Posts

    178
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The Green Ghost

  1. 3 hours ago, the blob said:

    I feel like even me, a penny pinching miser, has gotten sucked into the madness here. I just paid $160 (shipped) for a CGC 9.8 copy of an early 2000s modern classic cover marvel (won't say which). While I think I got a decent deal, it was on par with recent auction results, but lower than recent BINs. I look at the book, which regularly sells for $50-65 in raw nice shape, and wondered why it is that price in 9.8 when there are"$20 raw" books like MCP 72 that are well into the $300s in 9.8 and $35-50 raw books that are hitting $400-500+ (x-men 282, 244). Admittedly, each of those is a little younger than the book I am looking at, which might impact things. 20 years ago the thought of paying that kind of money for a modern would never cross my mind, but here we are!

    Well now you have to tell us! It totally depends on a lot of factors but people have some bias against early 2000s books. The wind will shift again in ten years maybe; 90s books were hated up until now, and Millenials have come back to reclaim their own silver age.

  2. 11 hours ago, Plantman said:

    This is also anecdotal, but Simpsons Comics #245 seems to be in the same (print run) boat. Issues 243 and 244 are ghosts compared to 245. It was difficult to find a potential CGC 9.8 copy of the latter at the local bookstores, perhaps because other collectors had already looked through these newsstand copies. So for anyone holding the last issue of Simpsons Comics for the next 20 years, don't forget the antepenultimate issue!

    I never would've thought of this until you mentioned it, but I worked near a Barnes and Noble when the last few Simpsons came out and picked them up. I guess it makes sense that newsstands for these series are rarer as there's no bags and boards to go around and it's open to damage even getting it from there to home, which is the same fate convention variants suffer. But at the same time I don't know about things being desired nowadays just for the sake of being perceived as rare. I got the last Simpsons out of nostalgia since I guess I knew it was ending, but not out of any thought to it ever being worth anything. I didn't give the newsstand much thought either, it was just the kind of thing that was unlikely to be at any comic store after pre-ordering for whatever month had passed.

    IMG_0324 2.jpg

  3. On 4/9/2021 at 10:46 AM, the blob said:

    Seriously upset that I did not sneak back into Midtown comics to buy more Frison virgin covers at cover price when they had them on the rack, limit 1 per customer. Just sold one for $125. At the time they were probably about $10 and I didn't want to be a pig to make $5. I should have been a pig!

    I wouldn't kick yourself, I picked up the Frison cover instead of cover A when it originally came out, and they charged $8 for it too as opposed to cover price. Still sore over it. Is Cover A selling for that much more than B and C? (Asking in general, not you specifically)

  4. 13 hours ago, maraxusofkeld said:

    I am talking about the same book as well, before Kirkman was made a partner at Image he was able to do crossovers and do work for other companies. As an example he did a run on Ultimate X-Men. Once he became a partner, I believe he was not longer able to do work for other companies or do crossovers even though he owned the character. 

    I wasn't unclear on that, I wasn't sure if that was the book we were talking about since no one referenced it in several pages. I still feel my answer (that there was no Image logo on it because it wasn't an inter-company crossover, irrelevant if Kirkman was partner yet) was most likely, although iggy didn't seem to like it, so it's all good.

  5. 45 minutes ago, maraxusofkeld said:

    I think the team up book came out before Kirkman was made a partner at Image, that could be the reason.

    I think he meant the Marvel Team Up with Spider-Man and Invincible- I assume the reason was that Marvel didn't need to put the logo since he owned the character and gave his permission, and Image had nothing to do with the final product. Unless I'm mistaken about what we're talking about- we need to start listing the comic when replying to quotes from pages ago.

  6. I really wish the weekly top 10 comics list would start coming out on a different day. The new Marvel episode/trailers/announcements always seem to happen late Thursday or Friday, so the list is always a week behind just because someone on CBSI randomly picked that day whenever the list was started. I look forward to hearing about King Shark and Truth #1 a week from now...

  7. 5 hours ago, fastballspecial said:

    Anything Captain America/Falcon/Winter Solider is really hot.
    All these books are screaming hot right now. I wish I would have
    held more copies of 323. Several of these books will be moving
    higher soon.

    Cap 312,323,354 
    Cap 6 Winter Soldier
    Cap 1 Falcon as Cap
    Captain America 1 1996
    Captain America 25 Death (This hasn't moved yet)

    And sleeper Ive been buying awhile.
    Iron Man 194 - I cant guarantee he will show up, but its dirt cheap
    and Ive been buying it for a long time. 

     

     

    What's the first in Cap 312? I never saw it explained anywhere...

  8. 3 hours ago, the blob said:

    perhaps it is the lack of keys relevant to current stories or MCU outside of miles morales, 1st sam jackson nick fury, USM #1 and a few others? for the most part "1st ultimate ___" doesn't mean anything. simply reintroducing "ultimate" versions of characters doesn't seem that exciting. but yeah, i bought a lot of these after the fact. they seemed attractive and shiney and liked them at $ 1 a pop.

     

    I kind of naively thought the Straczynski Spider-Man's (and Morrison X-Men, early '00s titles, whatever) would one day be rare due to the lower print runs and how the paper more easily got damaged, but that doesn't seem to be the case as of yet. I think if they had known what the current craze is they would've had more "first appearances," but back then the companies and fans were worried more about the quality of stories than gimmicks. Who knows what way the pendulum will swing, if they adapt New X-Men as the next MCU movie all of those will be snapped up and suddenly "rare" instead of leftover quarter comics. But so were the 90s titles once, too.

  9. It's funny how the market works. The 90s issues have become in demand, but the runs I always, always see in the $1 bin at every convention and store are Straczynski Spider-Man and '00s Ultimate titles. I thought they were seemingly not printed in high numbers, but absolutely nobody wants them. I have to presume it's because everyone of age already collected them new when they came out, which is why the Slott Spider-Mans for example, which many people tuned out of, are always pricier and rarer. I am convinced some of those will never ever gain value, but who knows? Maybe in ten years they'll get a nostalgia bump, and the wave will come around again. If ever Ultimate Spider-Man issues past the first couple become rare I will be convinced anything can happen.