• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

boomtown

Member
  • Posts

    2,273
  • Joined

Posts posted by boomtown

  1. 9 hours ago, Stevemmg said:

    Probably as disappointed as I was as mentioned in the post four above you. :baiting:

    Yeah, I read your post and thought 9.0-9.2 would be ok. Sadly, these were quite a bit below that.

    They did get back to me and are replacing the beat up copies.  Said all orders are inspected while being boxed up, so it must have happened during shipping. It didn't look like it to me, but we'll see how the next batch looks upon arrival.

  2. 55 minutes ago, d_russ84 said:

    That would make it starting at Copper and working back towards Bronze and uo to modern. Maybe start with the O'Neil run.

    Iron Man was a pretty rough read through the Silver and Bronze age. Really, the David Michelinie / Romita Jr /Bob Layton run that started around #116 was the Golden Age for Iron Man. If you do want to dip into the Bronze Age, I have a real fondness for the picture frame run from around #42-50, as that was when I started collecting Iron Man.

  3. On 12/29/2020 at 3:09 AM, Hey Kids, Comics! said:

    Same for Star-Lord. Mag is much more than Marvel Spotlight 6. 

    And Man-Thing. And White Tiger.

    But not Legion of Monsters. Or any Star Wars book. 

    I always felt that the difference was that "Legion of Monsters" was the cover title on the magazines used for a bunch of individual horror stories, featuring whatever stories of solo characters they used. While in the comic appearance it represented the team of monsters in their first appearance together.

  4. 26 minutes ago, Jayman said:

    Just the cover stories for each issue were reprinted (in b/w) in these mags from Supernatural Thrillers. The rest are reprints from other BA Marvel horror comics and original stories. Can’t say why the cover art was redone but I’m not complaining. The IT cover is by Gray Morrow and the Invisible Man by Dan Adkins.

    Yeah, they are nice, it's just odd, I always wondered if Steranko had a "one time use" clause in his contract. For years I actually thought that Invisible Man painting was by Steranko, until I noticed the Adkins sig. I didn't recognize the Morrow cover, but now that you mentioned it, I can see the Morrow style in it.

  5. I had a stack of that ASM 298 at one time. After 299 came out I started buying up all the copies of 298 I could find. My local comic retailer mentioned the book to get was ASM 300, I laughed and told him McFarlanes 1st issue was the one to have. I probably had 50 of them at one point, and 1 ASM 300 :facepalm:.

  6. On 12/8/2020 at 10:59 AM, www.alexgross.com said:

    disagree in that deadpool, cable and carnage are super dark and cool looking, and appealed to a large chunk of boys who grew up reading comics. she-hulk on the other hand was simply taking an existing character who doesnt even have a cool costume and making a lady version. no one cared in the 80s. and now there are far more compelling female heroes in comics and film. she-hulk seems unlikely to grab the kids in the way that harley and spidergwen have. 

    People may be underestimating a She-Hulk show. Wasn't she the original "break the 4th wall" character (before Deadpool) in her Sensational She-Hulk series by Byrne. If the Disney series plays off that, it could find a market with the new collector crowd that like that (stuff) .

  7. 5 hours ago, Corona smith said:

    I believe it’s also all previews of upcoming books which definitely takes away from it as well. 

    Yeah, I agree, it's just a cameo but people do collect them (esp. in todays market). While it is a preview, it is presented in new stories, not just previewing material that will appear in the books release. It also had, among others, the 1st appearance of the 616 Ultimates and Robert Maverick's (Red Hulk) 1st cameo.

  8. 34 minutes ago, batmiesta said:

    I never realised these were done by BWS. 

    Yeah, him and Steve Parkhouse did quite a few for both Fantastic and Terrific. There are multiple lists out there but most are incomplete as Smith doesn't really post them on his list of professional credits. He was really hit or miss on a bunch of these, the Thor really kind of showed his developing style, while Yagg the Slayer and Blob look kind of rough. It looks like he was 17 or 18 when he cranked most of these out. The Chameleon one looks more like the work Parkhouse was doing back then but it was on one of the lists I found so I included it. 

  9. 31 minutes ago, OtherEric said:

    Mighty_World_of_Marvel_12.jpg

    Savage_Action_01.jpg

    Savage_Action_03.jpg

    Savage_Sword_of_Conan_88.jpg

    I'm in the US also.

    I would pick up the occasional UK imprint every now and then and became interested in completing a set of Mighty World of Marvel. Prices from the US retailers was going to cost me an arm and leg so I started watching the Ebay UK site. After winning a handful of auctions for cheap, I realized that the shipping was going to eat me up. So then I started ordering large bulk lots from the UK. I've completed my Mighty World of Marvel set and started focusing on the FANTASTIC and TERRIFIC runs from the 1960s. I had almost put together complete sets when I came across a guy selling the complete runs from a single collector. Now I almost have 2 complete sets! Always on the lookout on Ebay UK for the huge lots.

    The Fantastic/Terrific books used terrible quality staples and it's almost impossible to find these things without some type of rust accumulation. It really bothered me for awhile, but after talking with some collectors in the UK, they say that the vast majority are like that. It's taken me back to when I collected to collect, not overly worried about high grade books only. It's a lot of fun!