• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Bayowolf

Member
  • Posts

    1,209
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bayowolf

  1. My notes say: 4 non CB spine creases, blunted corners,minor edge wear, small gouge on FC. Thanks for looking
  2. 3.0 as is.Looks pretty fragile, CP might loosen cover do other damage;if not you could get to 4.
  3. THe CP will take out smudge,not sure press will do much. 9.0 with smudge..9.2 after cleaning
  4. FriedPie Variant. Quite a bit newer than what I usually put up here. Thanks for looking.
  5. that back is very white except for edge.I might be pushing it but I'd go 6.0
  6. Oh boy..that is not just an error..its a disaster! I don't know what CGC would dofor this. Grade as a Qualified? Maybe 9.2 then. STill taking off something for thise pages thought.
  7. Also bottom FC not too good How did you miss that on FC?? 5.0
  8. Apoloogies for mislabeling this. TA and TS for mid1960s numbers are so close together. Spine is held on by staples,but is so worn and many little tears that I reinforced the whole spine. Thank for looking.
  9. I'll wait for the better pics , without those wide range
  10. Yes, this one kept the gloss very well! Thanks to all!
  11. Besides what you see ,there are a couple of other defects: staples moderate tarnish, subscrition crease (not visible in pics). Thanks.
  12. I don't think that chip is very big. Close up shows a scratch by Blades head that I dn't see in full picture. I see the spine tics though. 8.5/9.0