• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

DiceX

Member
  • Posts

    38,625
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DiceX

  1. That is not a 9.8. Quiet you. ANYWAY,I plan on selling it once I get in the mail. Flipper Indeed I am. What are you going to do about it? Nothing. I'm just saying.
  2. That is not a 9.8. Quiet you. ANYWAY,I plan on selling it once I get in the mail. Flipper
  3. Sweet looking 267. That's on my priority list.
  4. Incorrect. There has not been a single documented case of a second print being in a first print slab.
  5. Wrightson's first cover. This copy is from the Heartland collection and will be in a Sig Series slab with Wrightson's name scrawled across it in a matter of a few weeks.
  6. Not my favorite cover but one tough book to find in high grade. I may slab this one and cash it in to fill holes in my other runs.
  7. Love this cover. One of my favorite mag covers or any title.
  8. Ken Kelly did a lot of Eerie and Creepy covers. Very underrated and not loved like other artists from the series.
  9. Most of these are new but an old one or two is in the mix... Taboo is a run I'd love to finish. Tough SOB's in nice shape.
  10. Same here. Go have a look through the registry. I didn't get a chance to check those.
  11. There's also some garbage just to the right of that spot, in the white area between the two buildings, that is not present on the first print. But the dot you've circled is easier to see than the garbage.
  12. After comparing Jeff's scans and looking at other copies on Google Images, I've found a tell between first and second print. So far it's 100% accurate, but I'll need to see more copies before I'm convinced. It takes a fairly decent photo, but there's a difference between the two that's visible on the FC.
  13. This copy is in the registry and is owned by "vrecaro." I'm 2nd to a possible 3rd print!? And to reiterate...the size thing doesn't matter unless you're talking about differentiating a 3rd print from a 1st or 2nd but as discussed, a 3rd print has a more obvious tell. In other words, don't spend too much time measuring books. Spend more time posting your books so we can see if there's a way to tell a 1st from a 2nd from the cover. If he paid 23k for a third print, he deserves to take the registry crown away from you.
  14. I think that was the one that bumped Peter Palmer's TMNT set. Yeah, it's in the #1 set.