MPH1964

23 hours ago, Galen130 said:

We’re ‘grading’ a lot of these 300s.  Wonder why don’t I have one...or 100 of these. 

4 hours ago, Deadpoolica said:

Least I have one

Brutal 

7.5

6 hours ago, Galen130 said:

And @Deadpoolica.  As always...

@Deadpoolica has a TARDIS so...

Nice! 

Wow.  Didn’t see that grade at all...

15 hours ago, Galen130 said:

It’s got a lot going on...don’t think a CP will do much.  7.0/7.5

Agree... 7.0

15 hours ago, Deadpoolica said:

7.5....send to that other place for verification & sell her

Sacrilegious, but totally correct... no need to waste such nice signatures.  

20 hours ago, CJ Design said:

5.5

16 hours ago, 1950's war comics said:

not quite fine ... i bought this issue off the shelf back when it came out .....

fine-

Agree with 5.5

12 minutes ago, MattrixAlien said:

It looks like it's been trimmed. See cut off exclamation mark etc... 

I disagree.  The cover is clearly mis-wrapped.  A clear indication of that misalignment is how the white of the back cover showing along the spine gets progressively larger from top to bottom.  So, the further down the book you go the more the right edge is cut off.  

Unsightly, to be sure, but not a defect since it occurred during production.

Thanks for the comment.

Fresh copy of Amazing Spider-Man 107.  Slight corner issues and spine stresses, small edge impact and tear (maybe 1-2mm) printers crease through the logo, mis-wrap.  Pages are bright and White.
 

Hi everyone-

Presented for your opinions, Amazing Spider-Man 316.  Decent copy but not high grade.  Quite a collection of spine creases and some corner blunting. I’ve seen worse and I’ve seen better... What do you think?

5.0

2.5/3.0

5.5

4.0

5.5

5.0

8.0

9.2

9.6

8.0

3.0

4.0

1.5

On 5/7/2021 at 7:55 PM, Deadpoolica said:

3.5 

looks like moisture damage to me

Definitely moisture damage... 3.5/4.0