Fantastic Four #1 (6 pictures to view)

[tabcom]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[JohnT]

1.8, due to extensive general wear.

[Point Five]

Yup.... Apparent 1.8, tho presents a bit better. (thumbs u

[oakman29]

1.8 though a great candidate for restoration?

[THE_BEYONDER]

Agree with 1.8

 

Don't get it restored....get it signed by Stan (thumbs u

[NuffSaid57]

Can't really disagree with the 1.8, but I will stick to my initial impression of 2.0 if the book is complete.

[bronzilla]

What a great book to own regardless of low grade condition!!!

2.0

[piper]

1.8

[Dark Knight]

1.8

[gernblanston]

The difference b/w a 1.8 and 2.0 is a bit blurry for me but I would lean toward 1.8 based on the overall appearance.

[tabcom]

The difference b/w a 1.8 and 2.0 is a bit blurry for me but I would lean toward . . . .

2.0 based on it is in my possession.

 

thanks all for taking a look.

[JohnT]

The difference b/w a 1.8 and 2.0 is a bit blurry for me but I would lean toward . . . .

2.0 based on it is in my possession.

 

thanks all for taking a look.

 

You're one big book up on me

[Primetime]

2.0 Slight (A).

[THE_BEYONDER]

2.0 Slight (A).

 

[BrianR]

Looks like a little bit of the art was redrawn "outlined" by the monsters elbow and the 10 cent price was redrawn touched up. as well as the boxed area below the price.

[TFL-migration]

2.0 A

[divad]

1.5 to be different And yes, amateur touch-up, but by no means restoration in this context or grade.

[143ksk]

1.5 to be different And yes, amateur touch-up, but by no means restoration in this context or grade.

 

Agree completely (thumbs u

[Aces]

1.8 PLOD

 

Classic G- to me.

Nice book! (thumbs u