WOW! Amazing Spidey 14, CGC 10!!!!!

[minutekev@50]

 

What an insufficiently_thoughtful_person

[sborock]

"This is a solid issue in immaculate condition. "

 

On what planet?

[Fan4Fan]

Maybe it is one of those rare mistake labels from CGC... you know, the ones where they forgot to put the extra "0" in after the "1"?

 

 

Thanks,

Fan4Fan

[OldSchoolTerry]

"This is a solid issue in immaculate condition. "

 

On what planet?

 

Instead of slabbing 1.0 books, he should have spent the money on a dictionary.....

[minutekev@50]

"This is a solid issue in immaculate condition. "

 

On what planet?

 

Maybe he was referring to the slab..

 

And Steve, you should be ashamed..making fun of your customers that way...

[sborock]

[1962]

Until now I never believed that one actually existed, but there it is in front of my own eyes. Amazing!

[jduran1]

What gives you the right to call someone an insufficiently_thoughtful_person or in charge of the insufficiently_thoughtful_person police. Maybe he thought it would grade higher. We all make mistakes.

[goldust40]

 

What an insufficiently_thoughtful_person

 

Damn! He won't ship to England!! And he says you've got to own that book..........

[minutekev@50]

He's had the book listed for almost 3 days now and has yet to change the title. There's an astronomical difference between 10 and 1.0. He's received 282 hits since posting and I know most of that's out of curiosity.

 

But maybe you're right. insufficiently_thoughtful_person wasn't the correct word choice. However, unless he changes the title it looks like he's trying to draw people in with the '10' and catch un-wary buyers off-guard.

[jduran1]

Good point. I see what you are talking about. Misleading and baiting which is bad ebay ethics.

[minutekev@50]

[Amazing_Bag_man]

....this is the Seller and this is when he realizes that it's not a perfect 10....

[garthgantu]

What gives you the right to call someone an insufficiently_thoughtful_person or in charge of the insufficiently_thoughtful_person police. Maybe he thought it would grade higher. We all make mistakes.

 

See "insufficiently_thoughtful_person" *assumes* that he made a mistake... "gypsy, tramp and thief" would assume he knowingly used the "10" in his descriptor to attract and/or mislead would-be bidders.

 

So Kev was giving the guy the benefit of the doubt

[the_Greatest]

 

I'm pretty sure once a bid has been placed you cannot change the title without starting the auction over, you can only add to the description. There is no doubt in my mind that his goal is to deceive. I received a great email from the winning bidder on this auction spidey #3 1.0

I warned her how horribly it was overgraded, she had bid unknowingly as a gift for her son, and said she had trusted the seller's description without really looking at his tiny scan. I believe his use of immaculate was very intentional.

[jeff2004]

I'm pretty sure once a bid has been placed you cannot change the title without starting the auction over, you can only add to the description. There is no doubt in my mind that his goal is to deceive. I received a great email from the winning bidder on this auction spidey #3 1.0

I warned her how horribly it was overgraded, she had bid unknowingly as a gift for her son, and said she had trusted the seller's description without really looking at his tiny scan. I believe his use of immaculate was very intentional.

 

I can't believe that seller had the nerve to call that a 7.5. Should more like a 3.0 in my opinion.

 

[the_Greatest]

 

 

OK,at this point I think this knucklehead just has a severe numerical issue.

There is just no doubt about it. Spidey # 1 ????