PGM FF 73

[rube11]

Same quality and colors but lighter issues with the tanning or dust shadow.

 

Back cover lines near bottom look to me like very light "dirt" lines.

 

Steve

 

[madzlin]

Nice copy. Because of the tanning, I give it a 8.0/8.5.

[silverseeker]

8.0 with a shot at 8.5 sounds about right to me too...

[Earl Davis]

8.5/9.0

[Boozad]

7.5. Tanning again. It gets hammered.

[rube11]

I wasn't sure how bad CGC would hammer the book because of the tanning also. Will probably just sell them raw.

 

Thanks everyone for the grades!

[MagnetoWasRight]

8.0

[TFL-migration]

8.0 IMHO

[crazyhips]

7.5

[oakman29]

Nice copy. Because of the tanning, I give it a 8.0/8.5.

(thumbs u

[The Silver-Age]

9.0 Depending on page qualiy. If the pages are not tan, CGC has eased up on tanning/dust shadows a bit. I saw a book thats looked almost exactly like yours that got a 9.2 with Off white pages.

[trmoore54]

I'm gonna go solid 8.5...I've got an ASM 24 with tanning equal to that that is a 9.0...

[Timmay]

I'm gonna go solid 8.5...I've got an ASM 24 with tanning equal to that that is a 9.0...

 

I concur.

[rube11]

9.0 Depending on page qualiy. If the pages are not tan, CGC has eased up on tanning/dust shadows a bit. I saw a book thats looked almost exactly like yours that got a 9.2 with Off white pages.

 

 

Hmm...pages are not tan though around the inside edge there is some. Will that detract from the grade?

 

Steve

[Phicks]

8.0, IMHO.