Infinite Bronze Horror Thread 16 16

[CAMERANIAC]

I really wish this one was in better condition but I still think it's a neat cover. I know it's not really a horror book but it does say "DEMON" on the cover.

[precodekeith]

I always LOVED the "Goth Chicks" on 130 & 134...

 

I like 134 bunches, myself. Always found it odd though that the husband finds it strange to be getting company at midnight, yet thinks nothing of still being dressed in a suit.

[Weird]

I always LOVED the "Goth Chicks" on 130 & 134...

 

I like 134 bunches, myself. Always found it odd though that the husband finds it strange to be getting company at midnight, yet thinks nothing of still being dressed in a suit.

 

I think maybe it's a smoking jacket and an ascot?

[TupennyConan]

I always LOVED the "Goth Chicks" on 130 & 134...

 

I like 134 bunches, myself. Always found it odd though that the husband finds it strange to be getting company at midnight, yet thinks nothing of still being dressed in a suit.

 

I think maybe it's a smoking jacket and an ascot?

 

Could be. Cravat?

 

As for his in-laws, I'd manage to put up with them in exchange for the pleasure of being married to his wife.

 

Busty.

[bronze_rules]

I'm seeing a lot of HG house of secrets beauties coming out of the woodwork on comiclink.

Nothing like a recession to bring the beauties to the surface...

 

Although, I often wonder whether it's worth paying top price for an UHG with subpar QP.

Case in point, the hos 88s...9.6 @ 375

 

9.2 @ 200

 

Now is it just me, or is the 9.2 a much better value?

 

Although I know I am stepping into subjective bounds here, I'm sure long term collectors have formed some opinions on this over the years.

What do the UHG cognoscenti think?

 

[shiverbones]

I like the 9.2 in that match up no doubt!

[DiceX]

I like the 9.2 in that match up no doubt!

 

That's one of the best QP examples of that book I've ever seen.

Cream pages be damned, that copy is a keeper.

 

 

[Jayman]

Prime example of where QP beats out grade. I'll take 9.2s like that over miswrapped 9.6s all day long! (thumbs u

[greggy]

I like the 9.2 in that match up no doubt!

 

That's one of the best QP examples of that book I've ever seen.

Cream pages be damned, that copy is a keeper.

 

 

[DiceX]

I like the 9.2 in that match up no doubt!

 

That's one of the best QP examples of that book I've ever seen.

Cream pages be damned, that copy is a keeper.

 

 

 

Spot on, Greggy!

That copy is the bomb!

Best I've ever seen!

(worship) (worship)

 

 

[TupennyConan]

He posts some really nice books but this might be the best book I've seen Greggy post yet. Really, really pretty book.

[bronze_rules]

very nice.

[tkg2627]

I like the 9.2 in that match up no doubt!

 

That's one of the best QP examples of that book I've ever seen.

Cream pages be damned, that copy is a keeper.

 

 

Junk

 

Oakland Copy...

[greggy]

My copy is properly centered.

 

Your junk copy wraps to the back.

[tkg2627]

My copy is properly centered.

 

Your junk copy wraps to the back.

 

I'd rather have that so that there is some space between the CCA & the right edge of the cover. Your copy looks fishy with the CCA so close to the edge. Isn't it a Ewert copy you haven't bothered to send back to CGC?

[Weird]

My copy is properly centered.

 

Your junk copy wraps to the back.

 

While technically correct, his front cover still presents better.

[greggy]

My copy is properly centered.

 

Your junk copy wraps to the back.

 

While technically correct, his front cover still presents better.

No, it doesn't.

[greggy]

My copy is properly centered.

 

Your junk copy wraps to the back.

 

I'd rather have that so that there is some space between the CCA & the right edge of the cover. Your copy looks fishy with the CCA so close to the edge. Isn't it a Ewert copy you haven't bothered to send back to CGC?

Go press the edges because otherwise, it pales.

[tkg2627]

My copy is properly centered.

 

Your junk copy wraps to the back.

 

I'd rather have that so that there is some space between the CCA & the right edge of the cover. Your copy looks fishy with the CCA so close to the edge. Isn't it a Ewert copy you haven't bothered to send back to CGC?

Go press the edges because otherwise, it pales.

Scanning defect.

 

Clean the streaks off your case. Sterling will tell you how critical that is.

[greggy]

My copy is properly centered.

 

Your junk copy wraps to the back.

 

I'd rather have that so that there is some space between the CCA & the right edge of the cover. Your copy looks fishy with the CCA so close to the edge. Isn't it a Ewert copy you haven't bothered to send back to CGC?

Go press the edges because otherwise, it pales.

Scanning defect.

 

Clean the streaks off your case. Sterling will tell you how critical that is.

Scratches, dork.