DAREDEVIL #43 Fresh from MOTOR CITY CON!

[ROBTOTHEC]

Looks stunning in hand and Totally WHITE Pages.

 

 

 

 

 

[Timmay]

9.4

[sufunk]

Wow!

 

I'm on my phone but that looks INSANE!

 

That's definitely looking like 9.6+ on the small screen! Great score

[etanick]

wow...one of my all time favorite DD silver age cover....stunner..easy 9.4 with a chance of 9.6.

 

perfect wrap + white pages + dripping wet colors newsstand fresh.

[rodan57]

9.4

[thunsicker]

Front looks 9.4 or even 9.6. But on the back are those tears, folds or scanner artifacts? Specifically coming off the free and above the Wallace Brown? If they are tears 8.0. Folds 9.0. Scanner artifacts 9.4.

[ROBTOTHEC]

The back cover is completely clean and much whiter than the scan depicts.

There is no soiling or rubbing in hand at all.

There are two faint printers creases on the left and the spot on the top looks like

it was marked on the top of the book with ink I assume by the store that sold

it as that is how the often kept track of which issues were old enough to pull

off the newstand. (Color Coded)

[MR SigS]

9.4

Maybe a 9.6 if it does indeed look better in hand. AWESOME copy

[TSwift25]

9.2/9.4. Stunner

[sufunk]

In all seriousness, you guys saying 9.2-9.4, what are you seeing that takes it below a 9.6?

 

My eyes aren't what they used to be but even on my computer now, I can't even see a single spine tic! The top right corner has a little problem and looks like a tiny bindery chip on top of the cover but other than that, I can't see anything else. They don't deduct for those printers creases on the back do they?

 

That looks better than 95% of my 9.6's and as good as the vast majority of my 9.8's from that scan! What are you guys seeing that I'm missing?

 

Edit-actually there looks like one color breaking tic right above the top ring rope but still looks as good as any 9.8 you see IMO

[tjanse]

9.6 wow just wow