PGM Tales to Astonish 1

[blackwalnut]

Tales to Astonish #1. Looks better in the picture than it does in hand. Front Cover: two water spots with streak between them; one spot has a patch of color loss, the other is around creature's eye (hard to catch with the camera so I outlined them). Back Cover: long diagonal crease top to bottom (only the bottom part is really clear at lower left); chunk out at lower left. Everything else obvious, I believe. Thanks to one and all; if I ever get good at this myself I hope to return the favor.

 

[/img]

 

[/img]

 

 

[Artboy99]

2.0-2.5

[timfinz]

2.5 IMHO. I was going back and forth between 2.5 and 3.0 on this book. But the more and more I looked at the spine I thought 2.5 was more appropriate.

[*Bronze age fan*]

That copy presents nice! 3.0

[GIJOEISAWESOME-migration]

3.0 off white (thumbs u

[blackwalnut]

Much thanks. All input greatly appreciated. I had it at 2.5 myself so maybe I'm getting a little better at this...

[DR.X]

Too much stress and creasing on that spine to go 3.0 for me. Book looks like a dead 2.0, but 2.5 would not surprise me at all since no large pieces are missing on the corners..

[rjpb]

2.5

[southerncross]

2.0 ! now sell me this book

[Dick Pontoon]

I'm with Hoboken's Finest on this one, 3.0.

 

For comparison's sake, here is my de-slabbed 3.0.

 

[AnhDepTrai]

3.0

[blackwalnut]

Thanks again, all. Thank you for that comparison. I'm going back and forth between them, here, and of course it's hard to tell, but yours looks a bit better, not as much spine stress and corners seem a bit sharper...

 

This could get addictive.

 

EDIT: Hey, what is that? I typed in DP's name and I got SPOON? Okay, I get it. Good thing I didn't type *spoon* *spoon* *spoon*, eh?

[Lost]

I was around 2.5 - 3 for this....but presents super!

[Johnny545]

3.0-3.5