PGM Hawkman 4

[Mijael.Levy]

Here are the scans , thanks in advance !

 

 

 

[timfinz]

4.5 IMHO!

[Philreal]

4.0

[Hulksdaddy1]

4.5

[Mishmashman]

4.5

[Tivo32]

4.5 is where I'm at on this book as well.

[DR.X]

4.5

 

That back cover should clean up nicely but I don't think it will bump it up. Too much stress on that lower corner F.C. Solid looking book though.

[Mijael.Levy]

Ok , so its a 4.5 then . How can i clean up the back cover without damaging the book?

[DR.X]

send it to Joey. (thumbs u

 

http://www.cfpcomics.com/

[tjanse]

4.5

[Mijael.Levy]

send it to Joey. (thumbs u

 

http://www.cfpcomics.com/

 

Thanks , i hope he has international service

[Point Five]

A very nice 4.5. No reason to clean it, the book looks great as is!

 

 

[Mijael.Levy]

A very nice 4.5. No reason to clean it, the book looks great as is!

 

 

Thanks , to tell you the truth it was sold to me as a 5.0 but i like how it looks , i even like the date stamps and i am happy with the price i paid

[comicshark]

I concur 4.5.

[Lazyboy]

 

Thanks , to tell you the truth it was sold to me as a 5.0 but i like how it looks

 

The important thing is that you like it, not that it may have been overgraded by 1 step on the grading scale.

 

i even like the date stamps and i am happy with the price i paid

 

But Hawkman 4 hit the newsstands in 1964, why are there 1970 stamps on it?

[Mijael.Levy]

 

 

i even like the date stamps and i am happy with the price i paid

 

But Hawkman 4 hit the newsstands in 1964, why are there 1970 stamps on it?

 

Same question i am asking

[SuperiorSpiderMan]

4.5

 

That back cover should clean up nicely but I don't think it will bump it up. Too much stress on that lower corner F.C. Solid looking book though.

 

+1

 

 

[Conan_Aficionado]

4.0/4.5