• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

OK, let's see your favorite breas...uh... "headlights" covers

Started by BassGMan,

200 posts in this topic

mrwoogieman

mrwoogieman

Posted
Posted
If this were a real girl I would say that she could be anywhere between 16-25. Does not look like a child in any way either in face or body.

 

Bull Sid...the picture screams well developed high school junior. That's what makes it sick. And if you don't think so, I'd suggest you get out more.

 

Jim

 

Sorry, heterosexual human males find the young, female form pleasing to the eye. It's how we've managed to continue as a species all these years. Get over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
awe4one

awe4one

Posted
Posted
Sorry, heterosexual human males find the young, female form pleasing to the eye. It's how we've managed to continue as a species all these years. Get over it.

 

Sure...but there are age limits imposed for good reasons.

 

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrwoogieman

mrwoogieman

Posted
Posted
Sorry, heterosexual human males find the young, female form pleasing to the eye. It's how we've managed to continue as a species all these years. Get over it.

 

Sure...but there are age limits imposed for good reasons.

 

Jim

 

Absolutely. Non-perverts know that kids are kids even when they look like hookers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BassGMan

BassGMan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
If this were a real girl I would say that she could be anywhere between 16-25. Does not look like a child in any way either in face or body.

 

Bull Sid...the picture screams well developed high school junior. That's what makes it sick. And if you don't think so, I'd suggest you get out more.

 

Jim

 

Jim, go back and tell me "how old" all the rest of the girls are on the other covers. You say Junior, I say HS Senior or college, who cares? It is a matter of opinion and either way, it is a painting. If the woman looked 12-15 it would be different. This piece of art depicts a fully developed young woman. Take it easy. "Sick" is in the eye of the beholder. There is nothing sick about this cover nor anyone who enjoys it. I say this cover is erotic, especially without the censoring.

 

Funny how no one seems to mind the covers of women in bondage facing certain death. confused-smiley-013.gif At least in the cover in question you see a girl smiling and acting of her own free will. I guess some would rather see helpless women being bound and tortured, as if that was more acceptable. Go figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
drbanner

drbanner

Posted
Posted
Funny how no one seems to mind the covers of women in bondage facing certain death. confused-smiley-013.gif At least in the cover in question you see a girl smiling and acting of her own free will. I guess some would rather see helpless women being bound and tortured, as if that was more acceptable. Go figure.

 

The fundamental difference between the cover you posted and the rest (except for one other cover you posted) is that they are all basically comic books with superheroes, adventure, action, danger poses, etc.,. Transform these covers into real life as if they were a movie poster and you would think of an action, adventure, super-hero, sci-fi, fantasy movie, etc.,. Transform the cover in question into real life and you would think of pornography. In fact, it looks a picture from a "barely legal" website pop up ad. foreheadslap.gif

 

Since I've never read any, do the interior of those books feature any kind of humor, adventure, super-heroes, etc.,. or just sexual exploits?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lantern

Lantern

Posted
Posted

Since I've never read any, do the interior of those books feature any kind of humor, adventure, super-heroes, etc.,. or just sexual exploits?

 

 

Ummmm...yeahhhhhh....I've never read any of them either.......so could you please describe in great detail what the insterior is like.

 

"Tell me. And remember, this is for posterity, so... be honest."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
awe4one

awe4one

Posted
Posted
I DEMAND SOME PHANTOM LADY BREA......I MEAN "HEADLIGHTS".

 

893whatthe.gif Obviously you're in no position to demand anything! So sit back, shut up, and enjoy the covers... sumo.gifsmirk.gifflowerred.gif

 

 

 

 

Anyway, I'm sure they will show up eventually.... smirk.gif

 

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PovertyRow

PovertyRow

Posted
Posted

Funny how no one seems to mind the covers of women in bondage facing certain death. At least in the cover in question you see a girl smiling and acting of her own free will. I guess some would rather see helpless women being bound and tortured, as if that was more acceptable.

 

The women in most of the women in bondage covers do not die. They are either rescued or rescue themselves. Except for the pre-code horror and I actually do not collect the pre-code horror books showing a woman in bondage being tortured. I ultimately find the image a bit distasteful, although I can appreciate the shock value. But the superhero women, the action/adventure women etc, as I said are equipped to fight. They are part of an adventure story.

 

The only similarity between those comics and that school girl is that females are pictured on the cover. I honestly don;t see a parallell between the two as far as meaning and intent go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chrisco37

chrisco37

Posted
Posted
PM me if they are ever for sale. yay.gif

 

They aren't mine. I 'borrowed' the scans from Metropolis. Both books are for sale on their site. The #17 is just a killer copy!!!! cloud9.gif

 

I've thought about collecting PL's but, man, are they pricey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PovertyRow

PovertyRow

Posted
Posted
Except for the pre-code horror and I actually do not collect the pre-code horror books showing a woman in bondage being tortured.

 

foreheadslap.gif I got to read more into the post before responding frown.gif

 

27_laughing.gif27_laughing.gif27_laughing.gif

 

But you know Darth, I have read about more pre-code horror stories depicting female vampire's sinking their fangs into guys' necks! cloud9.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BassGMan

BassGMan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Funny how no one seems to mind the covers of women in bondage facing certain death. confused-smiley-013.gif At least in the cover in question you see a girl smiling and acting of her own free will. I guess some would rather see helpless women being bound and tortured, as if that was more acceptable. Go figure.

 

The fundamental difference between the cover you posted and the rest (except for one other cover you posted) is that they are all basically comic books with superheroes, adventure, action, danger poses, etc.,. Transform these covers into real life as if they were a movie poster and you would think of an action, adventure, super-hero, sci-fi, fantasy movie, etc.,. Transform the cover in question into real life and you would think of pornography. In fact, it looks a picture from a "barely legal" website pop up ad. foreheadslap.gif

 

Since I've never read any, do the interior of those books feature any kind of humor, adventure, super-heroes, etc.,. or just sexual exploits?

 

Holy Moley! And to think that I am having to defend myself on THIS, of all topics foreheadslap.gif.

 

So who cares if the cover depicts a "mortal" as opposed to a super-heroine or soon to be rescued girlfriend of a hero? Do we now have different standards for different kinds of female characters on comic book covers? The extent of what is allowed either sexually or violently depends on WHO the character is? foreheadslap.gif

 

Sure the interior is sexually oriented. Whether the characters are some kind of heros having sex or just regular people, what in the heck does it matter? Why are you saying there has to be "adventure" or "fantasy" elements for it to maybe be more acceptable? There are plenty of comics (mostly non-DC and Marvel) that deal with regular folks. So, these books are about some kind of lame hero but I believe that is just an excuse for the sexual content. So do we now have a problem with comics specifically created to be about sex? Do we?

 

I just don't understand where some of you guys are coming from. I'm not sure if I am reading here about double standards, accusations of child pornography, or that comics should just not have sex as a primary focus. confused-smiley-013.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FlyingDonut

FlyingDonut

Posted
Posted
Funny how no one seems to mind the covers of women in bondage facing certain death. confused-smiley-013.gif At least in the cover in question you see a girl smiling and acting of her own free will. I guess some would rather see helpless women being bound and tortured, as if that was more acceptable. Go figure.

 

The fundamental difference between the cover you posted and the rest (except for one other cover you posted) is that they are all basically comic books with superheroes, adventure, action, danger poses, etc.,. Transform these covers into real life as if they were a movie poster and you would think of an action, adventure, super-hero, sci-fi, fantasy movie, etc.,. Transform the cover in question into real life and you would think of pornography. In fact, it looks a picture from a "barely legal" website pop up ad. foreheadslap.gif

 

Since I've never read any, do the interior of those books feature any kind of humor, adventure, super-heroes, etc.,. or just sexual exploits?

 

Holy Moley! And to think that I am having to defend myself on THIS, of all topics foreheadslap.gif.

 

So who cares if the cover depicts a "mortal" as opposed to a super-heroine or soon to be rescued girlfriend of a hero? Do we now have different standards for different kinds of female characters on comic book covers? The extent of what is allowed either sexually or violently depends on WHO the character is? foreheadslap.gif

 

Sure the interior is sexually oriented. Whether the characters are some kind of heros having sex or just regular people, what in the heck does it matter? Why are you saying there has to be "adventure" or "fantasy" elements for it to maybe be more acceptable? There are plenty of comics (mostly non-DC and Marvel) that deal with regular folks. So, these books are about some kind of lame hero but I believe that is just an excuse for the sexual content. So do we now have a problem with comics specifically created to be about sex? Do we?

 

I just don't understand where some of you guys are coming from. I'm not sure if I am reading here about double standards, accusations of child pornography, or that comics should just not have sex as a primary focus. confused-smiley-013.gif

 

You can have comics with sex as a primary focus. That's not what the complaint here is, and, there's no way you can't understand that. The complaint here is that the book you posted is part of a trend towards making porn more "child-like". The whole trend is towards the "Barely Legal" and "Just 18" kind of stuff and the book you put up feeds into that. Whether she is 18, or 25, or whatever is irrelevant. She looks 16. That's the whole point of the image.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Go to topic listing