Wolverine vs. Sabretooth Question ............

[Hobgoblin]

This may be a real stupid question, but I'm gonna ask it anyway.

 

Wolverine #10 claims to be the first Wolverine vs. Sabretooth story, yet it was published in 1989, whereas X-Men 212 and 213 were published in 1986, and feature Wolvie vs. Sabretooth.

 

Does the claim Wolvie #10 only mean it's the first "SOLO" Wolvie vs. Sabretooth?

[shrunkenhead]

This may be a real stupid question, but I'm gonna ask it anyway.

 

Wolverine #10 claims to be the first Wolverine vs. Sabretooth story, yet it was published in 1989, whereas X-Men 212 and 213 were published in 1986, and feature Wolvie vs. Sabretooth.

 

Does the claim Wolvie #10 only mean it's the first "SOLO" Wolvie vs. Sabretooth?

 

Oy, always starting a new thread. Don't you have some fake Whitmans to go hock?

[rob_react]

This may be a real stupid question, but I'm gonna ask it anyway.

 

Wolverine #10 claims to be the first Wolverine vs. Sabretooth story, yet it was published in 1989, whereas X-Men 212 and 213 were published in 1986, and feature Wolvie vs. Sabretooth.

 

Does the claim Wolvie #10 only mean it's the first "SOLO" Wolvie vs. Sabretooth?

 

It's the first "in continuity" Wolverine vs. Sabertooth. As in, in terms of the Marvel timeline it's the first. It's not the first that hit the shelves here in the real world. That's one of the strangest notations in the guide to me.

[Hobgoblin]

Don't you have some fake Whitmans to go hock?

 

Um, no.

 

Don't you have someone else to troll?

[Hobgoblin]

This may be a real stupid question, but I'm gonna ask it anyway.

 

Wolverine #10 claims to be the first Wolverine vs. Sabretooth story, yet it was published in 1989, whereas X-Men 212 and 213 were published in 1986, and feature Wolvie vs. Sabretooth.

 

Does the claim Wolvie #10 only mean it's the first "SOLO" Wolvie vs. Sabretooth?

 

It's the first "in continuity" Wolverine vs. Sabertooth. As in, in terms of the Marvel timeline it's the first. It's not the first that hit the shelves here in the real world. That's one of the strangest notations in the guide to me.

 

That is weird. That's the one thing I dislike about comics is the jumping around in time. So the Mutant Massacre happened before Wolverine #10?

[Hobgoblin]

Don't you have some fake Whitmans to go hock?

 

Um, no.

 

Don't you have someone else to troll?

 

I meant "after."

[shrunkenhead]

Don't you have some fake Whitmans to go hock?

 

Um, no.

 

Don't you have someone else to troll?

 

Um, no.

[Hobgoblin]

Don't you have some fake Whitmans to go hock?

 

Um, no.

 

Don't you have someone else to troll?

 

Um, no.

 

That's alright. The fact that quite a few people like to respond to my posts diligantly just makes me feel like they would become bored in my absence.

[greggy]

Don't you have some fake Whitmans to go hock?

 

Um, no.

 

Don't you have someone else to troll?

 

Um, no.

Tom, you should make a better effort!

[shrunkenhead]

Um, no.

Tom, you should make a better effort!

 

I'll make a note of it...still not too bad for a fledgling attempt, no?

[greggy]

Um, no.

Tom, you should make a better effort!

 

I'll make a note of it...still not too bad for a fledgling attempt, no? You should troll someone in the GA forum for your next "test"!

[s-man]

Just a sideline comment, if I may...this match-up was the only good thing about the first X-Men movie, when they first meet on the road...

[BradleyX2]

This may be a real stupid question, but I'm gonna ask it anyway.

 

Wolverine #10 claims to be the first Wolverine vs. Sabretooth story, yet it was published in 1989, whereas X-Men 212 and 213 were published in 1986, and feature Wolvie vs. Sabretooth.

 

Does the claim Wolvie #10 only mean it's the first "SOLO" Wolvie vs. Sabretooth?

 

No, it means the story in #10 takes place years before Wolvie joined the X-Men.

[Hobgoblin]

This may be a real stupid question, but I'm gonna ask it anyway.

 

Wolverine #10 claims to be the first Wolverine vs. Sabretooth story, yet it was published in 1989, whereas X-Men 212 and 213 were published in 1986, and feature Wolvie vs. Sabretooth.

 

Does the claim Wolvie #10 only mean it's the first "SOLO" Wolvie vs. Sabretooth?

 

No, it means the story in #10 takes place years before Wolvie joined the X-Men.

 

Okay. I really don't know much about the "Wolverine" series timeline. I don't know where that all fits in with the X-Men. I've only got a few issues of the series and haven't really read them (1, 2, 10, 75).

[rob_react]

It's a flashback story.

[BassGMan]

Just a sideline comment, if I may...this match-up was the only good thing about the first X-Men movie, when they first meet on the road...

 

Different opinion here, this scene was the first BAD thing about the movie. Fake fighting, the way they flew through the air looked low budget, etc.

 

Before that scene, with the bar fight in the cage and the scene with Wolvie popping out his two claws leaving the middle down, and the meeting with Rogue, etc. That was well acted and cool. Then it gets all comic-booky (not that that is a bad thing though) with the cheesey looking fight with Sabretooth.

[Hobgoblin]

Just a sideline comment, if I may...this match-up was the only good thing about the first X-Men movie, when they first meet on the road...

 

Different opinion here, this scene was the first BAD thing about the movie. Fake fighting, the way they flew through the air looked low budget, etc.

 

Before that scene, with the bar fight in the cage and the scene with Wolvie popping out his two claws leaving the middle down, and the meeting with Rogue, etc. That was well acted and cool. Then it gets all comic-booky (not that that is a bad thing though) with the cheesey looking fight with Sabretooth.

 

Fights between mutants are a bit different then two humans slugging it out.