Super Strict Grading 1 1

[kimik]

49 minutes ago, ftlepore said:

I actually backed off of this conversation, because it basically became a peeing contest for about four people who have basically hijacked the thread to incessantly brag about their own professional experience and expertise and knowledge, while sh!tting on others. We're no longer even talking about the original topic, which is kind of obnoxious and unfortunate.

Personally, what I find obnoxious and unfortunate is all of the people starting up "CGC grades too strict" threads when their/their clients' recent CPR or modern submissions fail. While there is some deviation from time to time, CGCs grading has been relatively consistent since inception. The fact that there are a more and more sellers and amateur pressing/restoration services doing bad pressing jobs on books is BAD for the hobby long term. 

[ftlepore]

You're welcome to avoid any healthy discussion that you don't enjoy.

[theCapraAegagrus]