• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Ebay offensive material policy - Just the beginning of censorship, already happening? Whats the scoop?
3 3

631 posts in this topic

3 hours ago, Namtak said:

Well yeah i understand what you mean miller and others always had to fight for their idea ,marvel dc would not let them do what they wanted most of the time.dark knight returns is the culmination of his popularity that led dc to let him do it ,but he was still on a leash,thats part of the reason he is one of the co-fouder or dark horse comics.liberty of expression for a media originally made for children,and yet still critisized for his content in comics he lash out and drew the aforementioned picture of censorship that i first saw in a wizard magazine at the  age of 8 or 9.the message was cristal clear.

I think DKR was more than that (although young Frank Miler was just starting to scratch the surface of that issue of censorship). It was a divide between two different ideologies. The boy scout and the cowboy, so to speak.

And that the boy scout eventually came to realize that the cowboy's way was more practical to getting things done in the real world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, catman76 said:

I don't understand this. So you are ok with bringing back the Coon Chicken Inn and N*gger Hair Tobacco and the tens of thousands of products and books with racist stereotypes etc? Where do you draw the line then? Stuff like this should be removed because it's f*cked up and from a culture that was f"cked up.

So somehow getting rid of disgusting racist imagery and stuff means culture is doomed? What you wrote sounds like what people said 70 years ago when racist stuff was being removed and whites only lunch counters etc were being removed and white people were freaking out about their culture being destroyed.

stop making new stuff using those things, but as memorabilia or whatever, we ought to be careful about banning stuff. maybe ebay can let you opt in to seeing stuff that might be problematic. but yeah, maybe there needs to be something, because we have folks manufacturing Camp Auschwitz and SMNE shirts right now. Ought ebay provide that with a venue?

Edited by the blob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Prince Namor said:

Not if you just want to read it - which is the actual point of books... and book censorship...

Actual censorship would be trying to keep you from reading it. You still CAN, for free.

Screen Shot 2021-03-05 at 8.07.41 AM.png

I don't want to join the debate, but I doubt the kindle edition (free or otherwise) will be there much longer. The publisher is no longer publishing the book. Kindle editions exist at the behest of the publisher. If there was a publishing agreement for those digital rights (which I am sure there is - I've had a Kindle Unlimited edition on Amazon and we agreed to a fixed time period), the Kindle edition would last until the end of that agreement. It is no different than selling through what hard copies existed prior to the publisher making the decision to no longer produce new copies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, jcjames said:

Exactly. They call this "positivity".

Wrong is right, down is up, black is white, this society is deeply infected.

And a correction is on its way.

who is "they"? which one is this? i've porobablly heard it on the radio. thankfully, i can't make out most of the lyrics in these songs. they're almost in a different language that my ancient ears cannot understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, the blob said:

who is "they"? which one is this? i've porobablly heard it on the radio. thankfully, i can't make out most of the lyrics in these songs. they're almost in a different language that my ancient ears cannot understand.

This song won top multiple awards (American Music and People's Choice awards) and critical acclaim for its "sex-positive feminism" last year. "Sex-Positive Feminism" is a growing and widely popular (as evidenced by this multi-award winning "song") social movement to progress feminism to embrace and support the pornographic portrayal of women. Yes, that's exactly it's purpose - to oppose those feminists who viewed pornography as demeaning to and objectifying of women.

There is no bottom to the gutter that American culture (especially urban culture) is swirling down into at an accelerating pace.

I grew up listening to Stevie Wonder, Marvin Gaye, Smokey Robinson, Commodores, Manhattans, Diana Ross, Al Green and so many others. Motown was in high rotation in my house as a kid. What kids are filling their heads with today is pure toxic soul-killing poison. 

Edited by jcjames
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jcjames said:

This song won top multiple awards (American Music and People's Choice awards) and critical acclaim for its "sex-positive feminism" last year. "Sex-Positive Feminism" is a growing and widely popular (as evidenced by this multi-award winning "song") social movement to progress feminism to embrace and support the pornographic portrayal of women. Yes, that's exactly it's purpose - to oppose those feminists who viewed pornography as demeaning to and objectifying of women.

There is no bottom to the gutter that American culture (especially urban culture) is swirling down into at an accelerating pace.

I grew up listening to Stevie Wonder, Marvin Gaye, Smokey Robinson, Commodores, Manhattans, Diana Ross, Al Green and so many others. Motown was in high rotation in my house as a kid. What kids are filling their heads with today is pure toxic soul-killing poison. 

i was asking who the "artist" is. anyway, it sounds like she is making a request for services. unlike the male version of the guy saying what he's gonna do to some woman he is objectifying. totally different. :bigsmile:  anyway, this is a woman portraying herself in a pornographic way, it's a little different

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, the blob said:

i was asking who the "artist" is. anyway, it sounds like she is making a request for services. unlike the male version of the guy saying what he's gonna do to some woman he is objectifying. totally different. :bigsmile:  anyway, this is a woman portraying herself in a pornographic way, it's a little different

Cardi B. Female rapper, and porn "star". Yes, this is what is celebrated in American culture today, while Dr. Seuss is censored and pulled from feebay listings, meanwhile "non-violent" cop-killer and "inoffensive" porn lyrics pull awards and sales all across America's decaying sprawling urban dystopia . 

 

Edited by jcjames
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, MatterEaterLad said:

I've been watching this thread from the sidelines for a while.

I'm 1/2 Chinese and my take is this:

The people who are crying "WHERE WILL THIS CENSORSHIP END?" are overreacting just as much as the people who seem to want to ban everything.

Are they going to ban Mein Kampf? No, of course not, because it's not read to freakin' six-year olds (unless you're in a really weird household :insane:). Are they going to ban the sale of Golden Age depictions of racial stereotypes? I sure hope not. But again no one is reading Marvel Mystery Comics #30 to their kids at bedtime. I have that particular issue and love the history of it. I also own a bunch off Asian stereotype comics, like Charlie Chan, because to me they're interesting history.

I'm fine with certain Dr. Seuss books being retired just like certain Disney movies with racist tropes being retired -- because they're aimed at children.

My 2c

 

 

I think this thread is about a bunch of adult white guys worried that their culture is being ruined because they can't celebrate racism via Dr. Suess books. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Ryan. said:

I think this thread is about a bunch of adult white guys worried that their culture is being ruined because they can't celebrate racism via Dr. Suess books. 

Some people forget that certain mis-truths can be taken literally by others.

I sat on a plane one time next to a women watching Gone With the Wind. It was her favorite film and she treated it almost like a documentary in that she swore there were slaves who happily fought for the South, because they had such great lives. Ironically, I was flying to Atlanta to give a talk at the Margaret Mitchell House. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jcjames said:

Cardi B. Female rapper, and porn "star". Yes, this is what is celebrated in American culture today, while Dr. Seuss is censored and pulled from feebay listings, meanwhile "non-violent" cop-killer and "inoffensive" porn lyrics pull awards and sales all across America's decaying sprawling urban dystopia . 

 

well, it is sort of comparing apples to oranges (racism to porn). I am anti racism. I have no problem with porn in principle. I'd like to not expose young kids to it, true. And its probably  good business decision to retire these particular books from publication.  As for the cop killer stuff, I imagine ebay might take issue with that too. I can't really defend the lyrics. Record labels should put pressure to stop that sort of stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"What kids are filling their heads with today is pure toxic soul-killing poison."

I was a teen listening to Guns & Roses and Metallica. G&R had an awful lot of drug glorification and misogynism. Metallica's earlier stuff had an awful lot of murder and mayhem in it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, MatterEaterLad said:

Some people forget that certain mis-truths can be taken literally by others.

I sat on a plane one time next to a women watching Gone With the Wind. It was her favorite film and she treated it almost like a documentary in that she swore there were slaves who happily fought for the South, because they had such great lives. Ironically, I was flying to Atlanta to give a talk at the Margaret Mitchell House. 

The phrase I hate hearing is "what's the big deal" 

well maybe not to you but...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jsilverjanet said:

The phrase I hate hearing is "what's the big deal" 

well maybe not to you but...

the stuff about happy slaves was practically pushed as history in southern textbooks into the 50s. i even read some geriatrics on facebook saying stuff like that. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, the blob said:

"What kids are filling their heads with today is pure toxic soul-killing poison."

I was a teen listening to Guns & Roses and Metallica. G&R had an awful lot of drug glorification and misogynism. Metallica's earlier stuff had an awful lot of murder and mayhem in it. 

to clarify, i'm an almost 50 year old still listening to that stuff. i'm not really listening for lyrics at this point. appetite for destruction is maybe one of the greatest albums of all time. if you take all the lyrics at face value, yikes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
3 3