Post Your Dumb Comic Book Covers 0

[Randall Ries]

Because Murdock opts to keep his Foster Grant's on while fighting crime with hypersensitive senses.

 

[kav]

what the devil-

[valiantman]

Batpants... and more batpants.

[kav]

8 minutes ago, valiantman said:

Batpants... and more batpants.

"I keep taking this guy's pants off but he keeps having more pants"

[Hairless Wookiee]

Please read me a story Shazam!

[thunsicker]

8 minutes ago, kav said:

17 minutes ago, valiantman said:

Batpants... and more batpants.

Expand  

"I keep taking this guy's pants off but he keeps having more pants"

Batman is truly the Bartholomew Cubbins of pants.

[ADAMANTIUM]

[valiantman]

10 minutes ago, kav said:

19 minutes ago, valiantman said:

Batpants... and more batpants.

Expand  

"I keep taking this guy's pants off but he keeps having more pants"

All those camels walking away in the distance are loaded with bags of batpants.

[kav]

2 minutes ago, thunsicker said:

Batman is truly the Bartholomew Cubbins of pants.

[kav]

Just now, valiantman said:

All those camels walking away in the distance are loaded with bags of batpants.

posibly Rass Algol or wutever is just selling batpants and this is his source of income.

[kav]

I dont see how Kneel Atoms could screw this up.  If I was drawing the pants I'd stop and say wait i just drew pants-
Sort of an automatic safety feature one would think.

[Hairless Wookiee]

[valiantman]

3 minutes ago, ADAMANTIUM said:

It could be worse, though.  That could be a direct edition. 

[valiantman]

1 minute ago, kav said:

I dont see how Kneel Atoms could screw this up.  If I was drawing the pants I'd stop and say wait i just drew pants-
Sort of an automatic safety feature one would think.

He drew him without pants from an angle that should have been okay, but the editors censored it anyway.

[kav]

1 minute ago, Hairless Wookiee said:

The cover has to be actually dumb, not just bad.

[kav]

1 minute ago, valiantman said:

He drew him without pants from an angle that should have been okay, but the editors censored it anyway.

good call-he drew just underwear then the colorist fixed everything by coloring leg batpants color.

[ADAMANTIUM]

1 minute ago, valiantman said:

It could be worse, though.  That could be a direct edition. 

I tried to give it a description in the registry, I didnt know there was a clothes design print called " maude "

Herpe.....he....s....... Hercules Hercules!

 

[Hairless Wookiee]

1 minute ago, kav said:

The cover has to be actually dumb, not just bad.

Is this better?

[valiantman]

3 minutes ago, kav said:

5 minutes ago, Hairless Wookiee said:

Expand  

The cover has to be actually dumb, not just bad.

Where is the light source?  Nothing makes sense to light his chest and shadow his face. 

 

Is that Venom?

[Hairless Wookiee]

3 minutes ago, valiantman said:

Where is the light source?  Nothing makes sense to light his chest and shadow his face. 

 

Is that Venom?

Comic book historians have been trying to answer that question since the 90s.