Possible Ewert book sold on Comiclink - ASM #4 CGC 9.4 $13,000

[DKB]

I am sorry but those 3 books I show are scanned from the same scanner. Look at the line on both scans about 1/4 of an inch from the spider-man logo. It runs all the way down.

 

Not to mention you can faintly see it on the X-Men.

 

Oh and look at the far right margin on each book. Bottom corner about halfway, see that white dot on the slab? What are the chances that, that white dot would be on the same spot of 3 seller's scanners.

 

I knew Josh was lying. This whole Ewert thing is starting to play like

 

 

Note that this 30 cent variant copy of Marvel Spotlight 28 was bought by Comiclink from Jason Ewert

 

No longer listed.

[Aman619]

Since Josh may not be aware of his purchases and books that can be traced back to Ewert directly from his purchases:

 

 

 

2189296861 comiclink 9/1/2003…$335.00 Avengers #40 9.6

 

2189303157 comiclink 9/1/2003…$120.50 Avengers #50 9.4

 

2189312878 comiclink 9/1/2003…$393.55 Avengers #68 9.8

 

6540097518 0098488001 comiclink 6/22/2005…$79.00 Avengers #98 9.6

 

2226071096 comiclink 2/22/2004…$75.00 Avengers #119 9.6

 

6520667412 0098414014 comiclink 3/28/2005…$84.79 Avengers #127 9.6

 

6520668398 0098414015 comiclink 3/28/2005…$84.79 Avengers #128 9.6

 

6540100785 0098414016 comiclink…7:44:00 PM $48.74 Avengers #128 9.6

 

2292720609 comiclink 12/14/2004…$158.06 Avengers #132 9.8

 

2216420912 comiclink 1/14/2004…$92.13 Avengers #136 9.8

 

2292722496 comiclink 12/14/2004…$235.50 Captain America #140 9.8

 

6521101079 0098459009 comiclink 3/30/2005…$224.50 Captain America #147 9.8

 

2208668699 comiclink 12/11/2003…$410.55 Daredevil #20 9.6

 

6522525743 0098415015 comiclink 4/6/2005…$412.00 Daredevil #29 9.6

 

6522533412 0098471014 comiclink 4/6/2005…$115.00 Daredevil #85 9.6

 

6522747473 0626905004 comiclink 4/7/2005…$202.50 Daredevil #118 9.8

 

6522749189 0098486002 comiclink 4/7/2005…$192.45 Daredevil #125 9.8

 

2173680207 comiclink 5/13/2003…$470.00 Fantastic Four #20 9.0

 

2282534726 comiclink 11/10/2004…$665.00 Fantastic Four #118 9.8

 

2271621557 comiclink 9/27/2004…$214.35 Hero For Hire #2 9.8

 

2292729698 comiclink 12/14/2004 …$306.01 Incredible Hulk #136 9.8

 

2226100618 comiclink 2/22/2004…$97.00 Incredible Hulk #167 9.6

 

6540347263 0002055002 comiclink 6/23/2005…PM $405.00 Invaders #1 9.8

 

2195048807 comiclink 10/9/2003…$946.00 Marvel Feature #1 9.6

 

2272086785 comiclink 9/29/2004…$158.05 Marvel Premiere #2 9.8

 

6540360169 0002055005 comiclink 6/23/2005…$455.99 Marvel Spotlight #28 9.6… 30c Price Variant

 

2272088196 comiclink 9/29/2004…$1,375.00 Marvel Super-Heroes #12 9.8

 

2275116222 comiclink 10/12/2004…$227.50 Marvel Team-Up #1 9.2

 

2275117736 comiclink 10/12/2004…$382.77 Marvel Team-Up #2 9.8

 

2275127204 comiclink 10/12/2004…$256.98 Mighty Marvel Western #1 9.6

 

2275129001 comiclink 10/12/2004…$51.00 Mighty Marvel Western #3 9.4

 

2187772998 comiclink 8/20/2003…$710.00 Strange Tales #120 9.4

 

2275387813 comiclink 10/13/2004…$260.55 Sub-Mariner #34 9.4

 

2275389295 comiclink 10/13/2004…$282.00 Sub-Mariner #38 9.8

 

2292943414 comiclink 12/15/2004…$142.50 Thor #222 9.8

 

733362346 comiclink 11/15/2002…$306.00 X-Men #61 9.4

 

 

ummm, uh... WOWIE!!!!! thats a lotta books on Comiclink, huh?

[BronzeBruce13]

No… just purchased BY CL from Ewert off Ebay

[divad]

Since Josh may not be aware of his purchases . . .

 

Certainly a polite way of putting it . . .

[Aman619]

No… just purchased BY CL from Ewert off Ebay

 

oh. so are any of them currently ON the site?

Josh needs to call FFB to 'discuss' this Jason methinks..

[jimm94]

Hi everyone,

 

I wanted to pass along word that Josh at Comiclink link has received confirmation from CGC that the ASM #4 CGC 9.4 was NOT a Jason Ewert submission, and have therefore given the book a clean bill of health. I don't have any additional information about the book other than to say it's not one that CGC is worrried about.

[ComicSupply]

Hi everyone,

 

I wanted to pass along word that Josh at Comiclink link has received confirmation from CGC that the ASM #4 CGC 9.4 was NOT a Jason Ewert submission, and have therefore given the book a clean bill of health. I don't have any additional information about the book other than to say it's not one that CGC is worrried about.

 

How can you even believe that a serial number that is only 2 numbers off isn't from the same submission. The difference means that the 9.4 was the first book on the form, and that the 003 was the third book. How can it not be? More smoke and mirrors.

[deathlok]

Hi everyone,

 

I wanted to pass along word that Josh at Comiclink link has received confirmation from CGC that the ASM #4 CGC 9.4 was NOT a Jason Ewert submission, and have therefore given the book a clean bill of health. I don't have any additional information about the book other than to say it's not one that CGC is worrried about.

 

How can you even believe that a serial number that is only 2 numbers off isn't from the same submission. The difference means that the 9.4 was the first book on the form, and that the 003 was the third book. How can it not be? More smoke and mirrors.

 

Seems like Josh is on Jason's side.

[blazingbob]

So who submitted it?

 

Out with it!

 

Was it Marc Schreuder?

 

Trimmer X?

 

Trimmer Y?

 

I guess that means it's not trimmed either?

 

[skybolt]

So who submitted it?

 

Out with it!

 

Was it Marc Schreuder?

 

Trimmer X?

 

Trimmer Y?

 

I guess that means it's not trimmed either?

 

 

My guess it's the new guy on the block: "Trimmer Z".

[jimm94]

Hi everyone,

 

I wanted to pass along word that Josh at Comiclink link has received confirmation from CGC that the ASM #4 CGC 9.4 was NOT a Jason Ewert submission, and have therefore given the book a clean bill of health. I don't have any additional information about the book other than to say it's not one that CGC is worrried about.

 

How can you even believe that a serial number that is only 2 numbers off isn't from the same submission. The difference means that the 9.4 was the first book on the form, and that the 003 was the third book. How can it not be? More smoke and mirrors.

 

Hey, I'm just relaying what CGC told Josh. My personal guess is that Tom Brulato subbed it, but I don't know for sure. If you still have doubts, call Steve Borock.

[sfilosa]

Hey, I'm just relaying what CGC told Josh. My personal guess is that Tom Brulato subbed it, but I don't know for sure. If you still have doubts, call Steve Borock.

 

Remember that Tom Brulato also submits books (as you said). I to have a book that I thought clearly was a VIA submission, but it's been confirmed by Tom to be his book and never touched Jason's hands (or shall I say cutters).

 

That said, I might have it rechecked anyway because if we did find even one book that supposedly only Tom touched, that would be very, very bad.

[divad]

Hi everyone,

 

I wanted to pass along word that Josh at Comiclink link has received confirmation from CGC that the ASM #4 CGC 9.4 was NOT a Jason Ewert submission, and have therefore given the book a clean bill of health. I don't have any additional information about the book other than to say it's not one that CGC is worrried about.

 

Somebody's got their "stories" mixed up And at $13,000 who can blame them if their pants are on fire?

[divad]

Hi everyone,

 

I wanted to pass along word that Josh at Comiclink link has received confirmation from CGC that the ASM #4 CGC 9.4 was NOT a Jason Ewert submission, and have therefore given the book a clean bill of health. I don't have any additional information about the book other than to say it's not one that CGC is worrried about.

 

How can you even believe that a serial number that is only 2 numbers off isn't from the same submission. The difference means that the 9.4 was the first book on the form, and that the 003 was the third book. How can it not be? More smoke and mirrors.

 

Hey, I'm just relaying what CGC told Josh. My personal guess is that Tom Brulato subbed it, but I don't know for sure. If you still have doubts, call Steve Borock.

 

"joined at the hip" and then some . . .

 

Even my 5-year old daughter knows that, "If it quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck then . . . "

[skybolt]

Hey, I'm just relaying what CGC told Josh. My personal guess is that Tom Brulato subbed it, but I don't know for sure. If you still have doubts, call Steve Borock.

 

Remember that Tom Brulato also submits books (as you said). I to have a book that I thought clearly was a VIA submission, but it's been confirmed by Tom to be his book and never touched Jason's hands (or shall I say cutters).

 

That said, I might have it rechecked anyway because if we did find even one book that supposedly only Tom touched, that would be very, very bad.

 

I'm a bit confused here. Did Brulato use another account to submit his books, or were they all submitted through VIA? Do we need more proof than him just saying that this $10,000 book is clean since I submitted it, but this $100 one is definitely Jason's.

[deathlok]

Hey, I'm just relaying what CGC told Josh. My personal guess is that Tom Brulato subbed it, but I don't know for sure. If you still have doubts, call Steve Borock.

 

Remember that Tom Brulato also submits books (as you said). I to have a book that I thought clearly was a VIA submission, but it's been confirmed by Tom to be his book and never touched Jason's hands (or shall I say cutters).

 

That said, I might have it rechecked anyway because if we did find even one book that supposedly only Tom touched, that would be very, very bad.

 

I'm a bit confused here. Did Brulato use another account to submit his books, or were they all submitted through VIA? Do we need more proof than him just saying that this $10,000 book is clean since I submitted it, but this $100 one is definitely Jason's.

 

Brulato and Jason submitted using the same account. Yet another complication to the Ewert trial.

[divad]

Hey, I'm just relaying what CGC told Josh. My personal guess is that Tom Brulato subbed it, but I don't know for sure. If you still have doubts, call Steve Borock.

 

Remember that Tom Brulato also submits books (as you said). I to have a book that I thought clearly was a VIA submission, but it's been confirmed by Tom to be his book and never touched Jason's hands (or shall I say cutters).

 

That said, I might have it rechecked anyway because if we did find even one book that supposedly only Tom touched, that would be very, very bad.

 

I'm a bit confused here. Did Brulato use another account to submit his books, or were they all submitted through VIA? Do we need more proof than him just saying that this $10,000 book is clean since I submitted it, but this $100 one is definitely Jason's.

 

If the books bear the same invoice number (the first 6 numbers) then they were sent together in the same submission. Regardless of what anyone says, I believe the peoper term is "aiding and abetting" the fraud.

[sfilosa]

I'm a bit confused here. Did Brulato use another account to submit his books, or were they all submitted through VIA? Do we need more proof than him just saying that this $10,000 book is clean since I submitted it, but this $100 one is definitely Jason's.

 

All I can say is that Tom and Jason used the same account. Therefore (IN THEORY) there will be submissions from VIA that never touched Jason's hand and then (IN THEORY) there would be no concern with these books.

 

Unless Tom tells us which invoices are his, all known VIA invoices are suspect.

[divad]

I'm a bit confused here. Did Brulato use another account to submit his books, or were they all submitted through VIA? Do we need more proof than him just saying that this $10,000 book is clean since I submitted it, but this $100 one is definitely Jason's.

 

All I can say is that Tom and Jason used the same account. Therefore (IN THEORY) there will be submissions from VIA that never touched Jason's hand and then (IN THEORY) there would be no concern with these books.

 

Unless Tom tells us which invoices are his, all known VIA invoices are suspect.

 

Sounds like blind faith to me. Based on the representations that each have made, you can't separate the actions of the two.

[skybolt]

I'm a bit confused here. Did Brulato use another account to submit his books, or were they all submitted through VIA? Do we need more proof than him just saying that this $10,000 book is clean since I submitted it, but this $100 one is definitely Jason's.

 

All I can say is that Tom and Jason used the same account. Therefore (IN THEORY) there will be submissions from VIA that never touched Jason's hand and then (IN THEORY) there would be no concern with these books.

 

Unless Tom tells us which invoices are his, all known VIA invoices are suspect.

 

If that ASM #4 9.4 copy is a VIA submission, then I would definitely have it checked. If I was the buyer, then I'm paying for CGC's seal of approval.......not Brulato's.