• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Share your books that you feel are undergraded
3 3

26 posts in this topic

As a caveat - I'm not trying to call out CGC or be disrespectful. We've accepted them as an authority in grading, and I recognize that I'm not, which is why I buy CGC slabbed key books. I was just inspired by this recent thread (https://www.cgccomics.com/boards/topic/442575-incredible-hulk-3-with-stain-on-cover/#comments), in which a severely stained Hulk 3 still got a 3.5. I personally own a couple of Batman books - 181 and 244 - that present well above their grade in my opinion. I fully admit that I could be wrong and these deserve the exact grade they received; I'm just sharing that in my opinion, they look better - for example, comparing the 3.0 copy of Batman 181 below to the 3.5 graded Hulk 3 in the linked thread.

So I thought it might be fun/instructive to share these and also to see your books that you feel are undergraded and why. Here are my books I referenced:

181 Front

:IMG_3324.thumb.JPG.ad8b292ceea495f7ce60003ebdcf22d5.JPG

181 Back

IMG_3325.thumb.JPG.e576b94a93e72e6e3b8934525017db7d.JPG

 

244 Front

IMG_3326.thumb.JPG.02bf409c14b2268c0e0e8fc92b3a67cf.JPG

 

244 Back

 

IMG_3327.thumb.JPG.66cf98b09884bb94fbc212e1641590ee.JPG

Edited by Jesse-Lee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I don't have any or remember. I have plenty that look like they should but if you look close enough in the right lightning they are graded correctly by cgc grading standards. Yours look under graded by the pics though. Didn't think the hulk was over graded. I could see a 3 so a single grade off I can accept. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/23/2021 at 9:11 AM, Real Elijah Snow said:

Most of these I can see the argument. Overly tight and probably a bit undergraded, but this one though...Is the back cover in tatters? 2.5 on this seems egregious; especially for GA. 

Hard to tell, but looks like a big spine split?

I have a few I will post later. I actively look for books with eye appeal beyond their technical grades...which sometimes means CGC just undergraded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/23/2021 at 10:11 AM, Real Elijah Snow said:

Most of these I can see the argument. Overly tight and probably a bit undergraded, but this one though...Is the back cover in tatters? 2.5 on this seems egregious; especially for GA. 

Back cover is fine,, I haven't seen the grading notes but my guess is probably some spine (split, but not detached) issues

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/23/2021 at 9:43 AM, shadroch said:

You can't judge a book by its cover, and you can't grade a comic without looking at the interior.

So true.  There are some great-looking 9.xx front covers out there in 4.xx-6.xx slabs.  One the reasons the "trust" the OP notes is important.  You simply have faith that flaws you can't see are in fact there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/23/2021 at 8:04 AM, october said:

Hard to tell, but looks like a big spine split?

I have a few I will post later. I actively look for books with eye appeal beyond their technical grades...which sometimes means CGC just undergraded.

More often than not a seemingly low grade on a strong eye-appeal book with no obvious back cover issues is the result of spine splitting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple of CGC 3.5's (the A-Man and the MMC) and a CGC 5.5 (the Cap). I think all three are undergraded. The Cap has a near invisible water stain on the back, the MMC has some moisture warping and the A-Man has a lower spine split with a piece of tape on the interior. I think CGC hammers water stains WAY too hard, and foxing/dust shadows not enough. Never made any sense to me. One stain can't be seen and the book gets hammered. Other stains that can be seen aren't treated nearly as harshly. 

 

 

amazingman222.jpg

001 (240).jpg

001 (91).jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's two -

744378834_StarWars1(CGC8.5).thumb.jpg.36798d38be1b6f5680e40ee51692336a.jpg

There's creasing around the staples because of poor placement and it's a natural and unavoidable consequence of opening the book. Heck, CGC may have creased it doing a page count. Otherwise it's cherry. I'd grade it 9.2/9.4.

1057669427_UltimateFallout4CGC9.0.thumb.jpg.56f96c490f670e6895fccb7210f34382.jpg

I've been over this copy countless times with different lights and different light sources and can't find a flaw except for a very slight handling crease on the top edge. I'd grade it a 9.6/9.8.

I ignore the labels and I know I got better books than what the grade states.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/23/2021 at 4:04 PM, grendelbo said:

Here's two -

744378834_StarWars1(CGC8.5).thumb.jpg.36798d38be1b6f5680e40ee51692336a.jpg

There's creasing around the staples because of poor placement and it's a natural and unavoidable consequence of opening the book. Heck, CGC may have creased it doing a page count. Otherwise it's cherry. I'd grade it 9.2/9.4.

1057669427_UltimateFallout4CGC9.0.thumb.jpg.56f96c490f670e6895fccb7210f34382.jpg

I've been over this copy countless times with different lights and different light sources and can't find a flaw except for a very slight handling crease on the top edge. I'd grade it a 9.6/9.8.

I ignore the labels and I know I got better books than what the grade states.

Just curious if you pressed the uf4?

Knowing they came in a poly bag, it almost has to be pressed due to that :)

Itll have an invisible crease 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
3 3