• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Misprint vs Coverless
1 1

11 posts in this topic

Hi there. I've got a copy of Silk 1 that I had sent in to be graded, but it came back NG and said it's coverless. I had spoken with Customer Service and they said to resubmit it as a mechanical error and put a note stating it is a cover misprint, but it still came back as coverless. Could I get some information on why this isn't considered a cover misprint? It's got the same number of pages, same back cover, and the first and last pages are the same. The information I'm finding online is that the cover of this issue is the back cover of issue 1 B that was misprinted on this issue.

IMG_6678 Large.jpeg

IMG_6679 Large.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Hello Everyone! 

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. I just received an update on this. You can find this below. PS! I will be out of the office until Tuesday attending a Con for CSG (our sports card grading company). If you need any help feel free to reach out to Crystal CS or give us a call directly. Have a great weekend!!

Per our graders:

In the last 7-8 years or so, Marvel has had a rather confusing practice where they will manufacture a book with a special variant cover (usually a store exclusive cover), but then underneath it they include an additional cover that is essentially the same as the regular cover with no UPC  present, OR an interior cover that is all grey with only the book's logo at the center.  These extra "interior" covers will not include a UPC and/or price like the genuine regular or variant cover has.  
 
Therefore, if someone possesses what appears to be a regular cover of a Marvel book, but it is printed without a UPC and/or price (or with a grey cover that only has the book's logo at the center), it means that it is actually a variant cover that has had the outer cover removed.  With only the interior "almost-but-not-quite-regular" cover remaining, it is now, in effect, a coverless book.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it was printed that way by marvel (or some other comic publisher), why is it designated as a coverless book and not designated as either an (i) error print or (ii) a variant print?  

It’s not like a customer or store took the book and then removed the cover on purpose post-distribution or even as a fraud. This came from the publisher and they manufactured it that way.  Let me know if I’m thinking about this wrong, but isn’t an NG an indication that something was altered after the printing and once it was in the public’s hands?

Would CGC designate a blank sketch cover variant (wrapped over the same comic as a cover A) that came straight from marvel, as an added cover green label?  If it applies one way shouldn’t it apply the other way? This reasoning is unusual to me.

Edited by Marbleman3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
1 1