PGM Uncanny X-men #135 newsstand 1 1

[comicjoe1234]

No c&p. One of my fav covers ever

[Nschenks]

Some stress by the staples and a somewhat crushed corner bottom spine, but I don’t see much else. I’d go 9.0/9.2 with a press, but not sure how much the crushed corner would deduct. (See my comments from your other post)

[comicjoe1234]

On 2/5/2023 at 1:04 AM, Nsschenks said:

Some stress by the staples and a somewhat crushed corner bottom spine, but I don’t see much else. I’d go 9.0/9.2 with a press, but not sure how much the crushed corner would deduct. (See my comments from your other post)

Check my post about my punisher 1 limited. It has the same sort of damage as this, but worse. That said I believe it's a manufacturing error as everything else about the comic is perfect. There isn't even blunting just some small part of the corner that looks torn or something. It's a constant issue I find with those specific copies direct ot newsstand. They probably won't give me the manufacturing defect pass on the grade but we'll see.

[CHASEnBLUE]

9.2...maybe 9.4 on a good day (for the grader)  

[Artboy99]

8.5

Bottom spine crunch is significant as is the spine tics at the top staple.

[scburdet]

9.0/9.2. If you believe the CGC Guide, spine stress isn't treated as harshly as other creasing, but the corner ding is likely to drag a VF into the grade.

[comicjoe1234]

On 2/5/2023 at 9:20 AM, Artboy99 said:

8.5

Bottom spine crunch is significant as is the spine tics at the top staple.

Eh

[timfinz]

9.2

[mephistopheles]

On 2/5/2023 at 11:20 AM, Artboy99 said:

8.5

Bottom spine crunch is significant as is the spine tics at the top staple.

Agree

[grendelbo]

9.0

Thanks for posting.

[CONathan]

9.2 love this cover

[Golden Pete]

9.0

[Mars76]

9.2