• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Ditko Spiderman Pin-up on Comiclink
3 3

113 posts in this topic

On 2/23/2024 at 6:08 PM, The Voord said:

For those struggling to compare . . . looks like they re-jigged Spidey's limbs, otherwise quite close.

Personally, I'd class the Spidey pin-up as published (in altered format).

 

RAD04C5F2024212_125842.jpg

One thing supporting this is that his armpit webbing in the published version extends to his forearm.  That's not how it was intended to be, so if you bent the arm down after the original was drawn, it would end up there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/27/2024 at 2:19 AM, The Voord said:

Hey, Mike

My question was a rhetorical one, asked for effect, and aimed at those wondering if a CCA stamp was on the back of the artwork.  That is, if Lee decided (for whatever reason) not to publish the art in any of his books, why would it ever have been submitted to the CCA for censorship scrutiny/publication green-light?

I get that you're curious if anything was on the back of the art (it's not uncommon to find thumbnail sketches and the like, or maybe notes).  That's a different kind of interest.

Normally I'm sharper minded. Apologies my friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/27/2024 at 9:04 AM, F For Fake said:

Hater alert: What on god's green earth is going on with the anatomy over all? That intersection of thigh and waist is a trainwreck. It's like one big fused glob of muscle.  Of course, I'm not in the buyer pool for something like this anyway, so it doesn't matter what I think.

I've heard it referred to as "Porno Thigh".  

Once seen, it cannot be unseen. :eek: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/27/2024 at 4:01 PM, delekkerste said:

I've heard it referred to as "Porno Thigh".  

Once seen, it cannot be unseen. :eek: 

Ok, well NOW I'm into it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/18/2024 at 11:50 AM, grapeape said:

Being unpublished I think will temper the bidding. It's one of the best Spidey pinups by the late great Ditko though.

My guess is $395,000. I'll be surprised if it goes way over, but not surprised if it goes lower.

if it were a published pinup from the era of 1-37 I'd have it at $673,012.49.

So here's a thought. If grapeape wins this, is there a way to make this available to Marvel so it could be published in Amazing Spider-Man?

How about a tribute issue ASM #37 B with this pinup used on either cover or title splash, or center of comic! A 56 year old boy can dream:-)

 

I have no clue as to its value but if it fetches $200K I would be shocked. I only say this because it's an unpublished piece and I figured that for that price you could fetch an iconic published piece. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/27/2024 at 8:45 PM, Silver Surfer said:

I have no clue as to its value but if it fetches $200K I would be shocked. I only say this because it's an unpublished piece and I figured that for that price you could fetch an iconic published piece. 

It's going to be interesting to watch. In most cases I would agree that an "iconic" published page is king. In this case though we have an iconic non published piece by a comic art legend, drawing the most iconic hero in comic history (with no disrespect to Supes and Batman).

The quality, large drawn Spidey by Ditko....... published or not it's like finding an unbelievable treasure. The pin up I think matches or surpasses any page Ditko ever drew, and he displayed Amazing quality in his work in 1-37 and AF15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/28/2024 at 12:27 AM, grapeape said:

It's going to be interesting to watch. In most cases I would agree that an "iconic" published page is king. In this case though we have an iconic non published piece by a comic art legend, drawing the most iconic hero in comic history (with no disrespect to Supes and Batman).

The quality, large drawn Spidey by Ditko....... published or not it's like finding an unbelievable treasure. The pin up I think matches or surpasses any page Ditko ever drew, and he displayed Amazing quality in his work in 1-37 and AF15.

...and don't forget the quality work in Annuals 1 & 2 ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do people remember these? In 1966, Marvel released some "life-sized" posters of their characters that were drawn by unknown hands - possibly Marie Severin? [EDIT: looking at them now, I wonder if Syd Shores drew them. Was he around then?] Each pose is based on an existing cover or splash (the Hulk is from TTA 67) by Kirby, Dikto, Everett, Colan (I think), etc. The ASM was always the wild card, as the source wasn't obvious. I wouldn't be surprised if Ditko's pin up was from 1966 also, given that the other images seem to date from around then. And it's very cool, very exciting, but I also think it shows signs (like where the concentric webbing ends) of Ditko being ready to book.  That doesn't make it any less desirable - just trying to date it. 

BTW, I've always wondered what is up with the cover to ASM Annual 2. A Ditko Doctor Strange/Spidey cover would have been like a five-alarm fire of coolness.

 

 

Iron-Man-1966.jpg

marvel hulk poster 1966.jpg

marvel poster 1966 2.jpg

marvel poster 1966.jpg

Edited by glendgold
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My personal opinion is that those Marvel posters were drawn by Everett. 

Look at the line work on those figures. Look at Hulk’s face. 
 

I’m sure Marvel told Everett to tone down his style and make it more generic looking, while copying the figures from particular books/issues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/28/2024 at 2:15 PM, artdealer said:

My personal opinion is that those Marvel posters were drawn by Everett. 

Look at the line work on those figures. Look at Hulk’s face. 
 

I’m sure Marvel told Everett to tone down his style and make it more generic looking, while copying the figures from particular books/issues. 

I rule out Everett because I don't think the Namor looks like Everett's Namor. I agree on the Marie Severin attribution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/2/2024 at 9:36 AM, Unca Ben said:

oh, and i think  that the pin up is awesome among the best ditko spideys that i've seen.  i would give my left nut to own this.

Absolutely, and good to see someone else paying close attention to what should be oh-so-obvious!  Once you've done your homework and come to the realization that Ditko's original drawing served as the basis (in altered format) for the single-figure poster and Marvel Super Heroes group shot . . . it's probably one of the most iconic images of Spidey ever seen. 

Published as originally illustrated, no.

Published in altered format, yes

Definitely of its era, how can anyone claim otherwise, lol!.

Oh, and I don't see this as being some kind of rejected (alternative) art for the ASM #3 pin-up that Mandel owns.  You just have to see the way Ditko inked Spidey's webbing in the early issues with thicker line-work in particular.. The webbing became more delicately-inked later on in the run.

Edited by The Voord
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/2/2024 at 1:30 AM, Unca Ben said:

This. 

I think this pinup is the original drawing that ended up being the 6 foot poster.  Either Ditko himself reworked the drawing or it was done in production.  Ditko could have light boxed the original and made the adjustments, or a photostat could have been cut and pasted to achieve the final composition.

I submit that they are too similar to be coincidence.

final1.thumb.png.d3f637c04009588581154ff22744eee3.png

If the pinup is rotated about 20-some degrees to the left and a vertical line bisects the figure we can make some observations on both compositions.  hm

Ignore the left leg and the right arm just for a moment.

The line bisects the face the same.  it brushed up against the tips of the legs of the chest spider-symbol the same.  it goes thru just left of the crotch the same.  The space between the line and the left thumb is the same.  the space between the line and the right foot is the same.  Think "negative space".  The two negative spaces created by the bisecting line in the lower half of the figure are exactly the same.  The webbing thru the face, torso, belt, left arm, right boot are exact.  Muscles in the chest left arm and right leg are the same.  The right underarm spotted black could have been whited out or ignored on the new light boxed drawing.

Once again, the compositions and details are just too similar to be coincidence so I submit this is the original drawing (or the "original" original drawing) for the famous 6 foot pinup.  If my observations prove to be correct and I were the seller, I'd really want this stuff to be mentioned.

Has anyone ever seen the drawing for the 6 foot pin up?  I'd be willing to bet that it is either: a cut and pasted Photostatted version of this pin-up, or a second drawing that was light boxed from the first.
 

Excellent case made here. Your logic is sound. This is a special piece no doubt. My brother has the 6ft poster and I can see it. If only Stan were around to confirm it. If I could afford the piece at auction I would give my....ahhhh, Uncle Ben, you're a brave man then ole grapeape.

Ditko6ft.poster2.thumb.jpeg.3cd815fbabf3a780791fa280bfc64a15.jpeg

Ditko6ft.poster.thumb.jpeg.b749f4d7ccfeac0e81926c311beae97f.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/2/2024 at 4:36 AM, Unca Ben said:

oh, and i think  that the pin up is awesome among the best ditko spideys that i've seen.  i would give my left nut to own this.

Is this an example of "trading up"?    (shrug)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/2/2024 at 2:40 AM, The Voord said:

Absolutely, and good to see someone else paying close attention to what should be oh-so-obvious!  Once you've done your homework and come to the realization that Ditko's original drawing served as the basis (in altered format) for the single-figure poster and Marvel Super Heroes group shot . . . it's probably one of the most iconic images of Spidey ever seen. 

Published as originally illustrated, no.

Published in altered format, yes

Definitely of its era, how can anyone claim otherwise, lol!.

Oh, and I don't see this as being some kind of rejected (alternative) art for the ASM #3 pin-up that Mandel owns.  You just have to see the way Ditko inked Spidey's webbing in the early issues with thicker line-work in particular.. The webbing became more delicately-inked later on in the run.

Yeah. His drawing style on Spider-Man was much different from ish 3 to issue 28 or 30 ( or thereabouts when this poster was first mentioned as a "mystery mailing tube" on the Bullpen Bulletins page).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
3 3