Amazing Fantasy 15 Grade?

[Thomas]

Hi all, I am thinking of bidding on this and submitting it. What do you think it'll grade as? I've been looking for a lower grade copy for a while and this seller is only a couple hours from me so I'll go pick it up in person.

 

Thanks!

 

Ebay auction

http://outside-affiliatelinksnotallowed.com/nqhbx

 

[Psiknight]

Without the back cover it's tough to tell, but it looks like a 2.0 to me.

[Point Five]

Agree! 2.0 looks just right based on this scan. Though maybe assume 1.8 to be safe. Definitely get a back cover scan if you don't have one already.

[-cryptkeeper-]

looks 2.0 sweet book

[Durden08]

Structurally it looks like a nice 2.0. Is that piece above the "N" in Amazing firmly attached?

[Comicdey]

If the price is right and a local pick up....looks nice. The upper piece looks torn and creased, but solid. I'd say it's a solid 2.0

[Thomas]

Structurally it looks like a nice 2.0. Is that piece above the "N" in Amazing firmly attached?

 

I can't tell from the auction and I've asked the seller about it but haven't heard back yet.

 

I was hoping that it may be a 2.0 and am trying to prepare my final bid amount so thank you to all that have replied so far.

[comic_lot]

I agree, 2.0. Good luck in auction!

[Aces]

1.8/2.0

Lots of chipping might dip it to 1.8.

Still a respectible book.

[Carnage]

a great looking 2.0

[divad]

1.8 If it's got a BC

[FFB]

2.0 to 2.5 unless there is something really wrong with the back cover. I don't see anything that would take the book down to 1.8 IMO. 2.5 is a real possibility.

[Thomas]

I'm hoping to win it and then submit it so we'll see what it comes back as. If I win it, I'll post back here with the final grade.

 

Thanks for the advice guys.

[spidrvacc]

Seller added this

 

There is no restoration whatsoever. The fold between the "I" and the "N" in the word "amazing" is just a fold with a tiny cut at the bottom. The back cover is good looking and well attached.

 

 

http://cgi.ebay.com/Amazing-Fantasy-15-1...1QQcmdZViewItem

[divad]

2.0 to 2.5 unless there is something really wrong with the back cover. I don't see anything that would take the boook down to 1.8 IMO. 2.5 is a real possibility.

 

Actually, I see quite a bit that would take the boook down to a 1.8, and a 2.5 is out of the question

[FFB]

2.0 to 2.5 unless there is something really wrong with the back cover. I don't see anything that would take the boook down to 1.8 IMO. 2.5 is a real possibility.

 

Actually, I see quite a bit that would take the boook down to a 1.8, and a 2.5 is out of the question

 

So you claim. Similar scans on Heritage say otherwise.

[burntboy]

i agree with all of the 2.0 estimates.....................

 

hey, how's your AF#15 restoration coming along? by now you should be able to write a book about it.......................