So . . . Grade my Siver Surfer #4 :makepoint:

[divad]

 

 

[squidmo2000]

It looks like a 4.0 to me..........

[uclapeterg]

How much of a lower spine split is there?

[mdandy8]

4 maybe less, depends on that spine.

[Shadow]

I'm thinking 3.0, maybe 3.5

[topofthetotem]

3.5

[Dad&Son-migration]

4.0

[piper]

3.5

[Point Five]

Yep...would be a nice 4.0/4.5, but probably 3.5 for that spine split/ding at the bottom. That kind of defect is what I don't like about the SA squarebounds in lower grade... Book still presents pretty well tho.

[garthgantu]

3.5

 

this feels like the kind of book where you'd find a few more defects if you were scrutinizing it in person... I realize it's a large scan... just 'feels' like there's more (or rather less) than meets the eye here... I love that Buscema cover, tho!

[divad]

this feels like the kind of book where you'd find a few more defects if you were scrutinizing it in person... I realize it's a large scan... just 'feels' like there's more (or rather less) than meets the eye here... I love that Buscema cover, tho!

 

Just the opposite actually . . .

[djpinkpanther67]

3.5, D

[jools&jim]

Solid VG...still don't do the numbers thing, sorry (but I'm a-learnin'!)...

[Fandango]

I still tend to think in terms of the older worded grading definitions, though lurking in grading has help bring me up to date. Clearly the book is a 6.2 Near Fine

[rjpb]

I still tend to think in terms of the older worded grading definitions, though lurking in grading has help bring me up to date. Clearly the book is a 6.2 Near Fine

 

 

Nickel graded

[alwaysbronze]

3.5

[Lazyboy]

4.0

[divad]

I still tend to think in terms of the older worded grading definitions, though lurking in grading has help bring me up to date. Clearly the book is a 6.2 Near Fine