Daredevil #168

[RedGiant]

Completely lost on this one, could use some help - I'm mainly concerned with the ink smudges along the spine. This is my first post, so sorry if scans aren't very big but the FAQs said to keep the size down, so I've included links to much larger scans as well.

here is a much larger scan as well (about 800k)

http://redgiantproductions.com/dd168front.jpg

and here is a much larger back cover scan as well

http://redgiantproductions.com/dd168back.jpg

[joeypost]

I had a copy graded at 9.2 that had the same ink line yours has on the BC. I just assumed it was pen, but it looks like it may have been a production flaw.

 

Bottom edge on BC looks a little funky. I'd say 9.0.

[divad]

I had a copy graded at 9.2 that had the same ink line yours has on the BC. I just assumed it was pen, but it looks like it may have been a production flaw.

 

Bottom edge on BC looks a little funky. I'd say 9.0.

 

Yep, production flaw.

[Dad&Son-migration]

9.0 is perfect...

[silverseeker]

I'd also go with 9.0 with a slim chance of getting 9.2, depending on how much the lower right back cover corner and ink smudges (from production) affect the grade.

 

Nice copy!

[marvelcollector]

9.0..more to general dirtiness than any dings, etc....

[Dr_Neff]

8.5 I submitted and received 14 copies ranging from 3.0 to 9.6 this looks like an 8.5

[50 Cent #II (1st)]

9.0