• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

newshane

Member
  • Posts

    5,952
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by newshane

  1. My wife actually encourages me to buy comics when I shoudln't, and makes sad faces when I tell her about selling. I guess I hit the lottery!
  2. Threatening to refuse delivery of the books while notifying PayPal was pretty disgusting, but trying to pull this scam was the cherry on top of the turd. ...on top of that, the seller is out for a portion of the shipping costs, not to mention the freebies. I know that life is tough and we all have personal struggles, but that doesn't excuse business conducted on this level of shadiness.
  3. I think the best thing to do is just apologize and move forward without any other excuses or explanations. You should also consider starting a new profile. Half the board isn't going to go near you with a deal after what they've read here.
  4. I just think there are lots of accusations against you that are going to be difficult or impossible to explain away. Using personal circumstance as a smokescreen isn't going to be very effective.
  5. I'm sorry to hear about your personal issues. I really am sympathetic; however, I fail to see how it excuses your behavior throughout this situation and find it unfortunate that you would even mention it.
  6. Has any of his Spawn work been sold, or is he keeping all of that stuff? I've only seen pages from the other artists on the series.
  7. I want to hit the second tier restocking fee on my way to a lifetime ban.
  8. Overstreet allows minor bindery "defects" in 9.9s.
  9. I was about to remove my post, which was made before I finished reading the thread! That's what I get!
  10. I'm not baffled that there are collectors who will pay the premium. All I said was that I didn't personally understand it, and that it holds no allure for me. Besides, I admitted the irrelevance of the statement. That was the exact point I was trying to make. The buyer didn't ask for clarification because he was hoping to get a deal. Nothing wrong with that.
  11. I get your point, but I doubt any 9.8 newsstand editions actually survived the spinner racks unscathed. In fact, the book probably tumbled in grade the moment the uncaring clerk at Krogers took it out of the box...then tumbled again the moment it hit the spinner rack...then again after kids thumbed through the pages with fingers freshly greased from the consumption of an order of McNuggets...then maybe again when the book was taken off the shelf...etc. Those books probably stayed in the box, no? And I agree with another poster - I'm just not a big fan of the barcode look. It won't stop me from buying a book, but I wouldn't go chasing after one either.
  12. There is nothing wrong with what you did. I want to say that up front. But the way I see it, you were both playing a bit of a game. You didn't ask for clarity because you were hoping to snag a deal. He wasn't being clear because he was hoping to get away with it. In the end, it was a harmless gamble for you. He won't get stung too hard, other than the pain of dealing with a return. Like you said, there is a very good chance the seller knows exactly what he was going and will continue to use the bait. I understand how this can be frustrating for someone who collects newsstands.
  13. I'm still baffled at the lure of "newsstand" editions, and I certainly don't understand the huge markups that some people are willing to pay. In the end, however, that's an irrelevant opinion. To each their own! I am glad you will be able to get your money back, but I'm still not certain why you didn't simply ask first. Seems like it would have saved you both a lot of trouble. Perhaps you were hoping for a deal and didn't get what you wanted? Not that there is anything wrong with that, just sayin'.
  14. Did you not confirm with the seller beforehand? If not, looks like that's part of the chance you took. In a way, he's correct.The CGC only makes a distinction of the newsstand edition is truly different. For example. CGC makes a distinction for Spawn 9 newsstand because it's made of newsprint paper, unlike the direct edition. Other newsstand books may get the distinction because they were released without special inserts, cards, coupons, foil, etc. I'm sorry you didn't get what you wanted, but I'm puzzled as to why you didn't contact the seller first. I'm not sure it's "bait and switch" since you didn't confirm with the seller. That being said, the seller IS also at fault for not being absolutely clear about what you were getting...even though he/she did say that multiple copies with multiple certs would be involved in the auction. A little bit of clarity and inquiry would have went a long way.
  15. this year is the last time you will see this set together. I've worked for years and this is the best I could do: CLICK HERE TO VIEW MY SPAWN SET Going all in for the modern age competition! Now or never.
  16. I'm very, very sad they never used this.
  17. EDIT: 165 always seemed to be super hot...ditto for 175 and 176, the famous "Gunslinger" issues. Looking back through the run, there are many that I remember giving me lots of trouble. Definitely can't go wrong scooping up anything (at least high grade) between 110-199 if you want to be real.
  18. 110 - 199, with things getting increasingly more difficult as the issue numbers rise. Issue 200 had lots of variants and a relatively high print run, then things start to get tough from 201 all the way through the homage covers. I'd say 151 through 184 are the most exotic. Some of those books are insane. Very tough in grade because of the grade-busting dark colors that were used. There are enough people now who realize the truth about those books and are privy to their value. People are paying way too much for the early issues and not enough for the later, TOUGH ones! Also, the registry points are long overdue for an overhaul! Only 20 points for #175? WTH? For six or seven years now I've been working on the entire run in 9.8 or higher. I'm five short of that goal and I've looked EVERYWHERE and offered tons and tons of cash. Nothing. Not a word. I have three of the missing five in 9.6, so that will have to do for now. But those books are super hard in top grade and are majorly slept on.
  19. If you hate the story of the first 12 issues of Spawn, you can blame at least a few of them on no-name guys like, well, Neil Gaiman (issue 9), Dave Sim (issue 10), Frank Miller (issue 11), and Alan Moore (issue 8). I think the main problem with Spawn has always been identity. In the early years, it seemed that Todd couldn't decide if he wanted to market the books to children, depressed teens, or horror fans. Also, the quality has waxed and waned throughout the years depending on the writer and art team. You see huge, sudden leaps in style...just look at the last 75 issues of Spawn, for example. We go from dark, gothic art (Kudranski) to the childish lines drawn by Erik Larsen (HURK) and now we are seeing more "dark" painted art again. Todd will leap in for a dozen or so issues in order to "save things", which has never done anything other than add to the mess. Spawn needs continuity, direction, stability, and purpose. The chances of commercial success go way down as Todd continues to struggle with what he wants to do with the character. And now, for the movie, he wants a "ghost-like" character that doesn't speak. I guess we'll have to see. Regarding the overall run, there have been some great issues and storylines (I actually like the supernatural character as written by Holguin), but as a whole, it's a fractured mess, despite the (mostly) awesome artwork. I just don't have much faith in Todd as a writer, let alone a director. The concept of Spawn has a great deal of potential, but it's been unrealized because Todd has been uncomfortable with letting a good team run with the character. Maybe the movie will take off and I can sell my slabbed run to someone with a lot of money.
  20. Not sure about that. Vancouver, for example, is a junkie haven and has been for decades. It's no Detroit or Chicago, but I'd say there are still plenty of opportunities to make bad choices in spite of where someone lives.