scottish

"A friendly offer to discuss something in person with "cowards" is probably not going to fool anyone into thinking you meant a group self-affirmation session." (thumbs u

So to summarize, you're mad at us for calling you a d.u.m.b.a.s.s because you were a d.u.m.b.a.s.s and didn't want to listen to anyone and try to understand that you were a d.u.m.b.a.s.s. So now this morning, you actually investigate what everyone was telling you, and you come to the conclusion that you were a d.u.m.b.a.s.s, and you make an apology that isn't really an apology, it's to make the people that were calling you a d.u.m.b.a.s.s less credible for calling you a d.u.m.b.a.s.s Dude. Call it a day. You've burned the bridge. There are no words that will win you back any credibility at this point. You messed up. Just call it a lessoned learned. It's rather odd that you mention how you could care less about other board member's opinions, yet you consistently respond the these opinions with anger and veiled threats. Seems like you care (or at least did) to me.

Looks like she has a slight overbite.

Wow, I never knew one could mention the word "Frank" so many times in one post. I wonder if Vanna could sell you a pronoun? That's what I'm talking about! I ramped up the smartass just for you. And I appreciate it. We all need more smartass right now. Somebody call my name? You're a *nice* smartass Roy. Watson is more of an equal opportunity smartass.

Wow, I never knew one could mention the word "Frank" so many times in one post. I wonder if Vanna could sell you a pronoun? That's what I'm talking about! I ramped up the smartass just for you. And I appreciate it. We all need more smartass right now.

Wow, I never knew one could mention the word "Frank" so many times in one post. I wonder if Vanna could sell you a pronoun? That's what I'm talking about!

More deadpan. I prefer more smartass. Check out the gay Archie thread. (thumbs u The first part of the thread where it was fun with me and the_black_hand, not the crappy part that comes after that. (thumbs u

More deadpan. I prefer more smartass. Check out the gay Archie thread. (thumbs u

More deadpan. I prefer more smartass.

oh, I think it was resolved... Frank says the books are different, nothing wrong done, his closest board friends support him (although apparently privately, not publicly) 99% of the boards say the books are the same from the compelling visual evidence and frank has lost the trust of 99% of the board... pretty much sums it up (thumbs u I was trying to be funny - failing horribly. I'll leave the levity to those that have a better funny bone. I know that, but some might want a readers digest recap update Excellent recap! (thumbs u

oh, I think it was resolved... Frank says the books are different, nothing wrong done, his closest board friends support him (although apparently privately, not publicly) 99% of the boards say the books are the same from the compelling visual evidence and frank has lost the trust of 99% of the board... pretty much sums it up (thumbs u I was trying to be funny - failing horribly. I'll leave the levity to those that have a better funny bone. You said "bone." Yes - and here is one of the master comedians I was speaking of. Oh great comedy master, please teach me your funny bone ways!

oh, I think it was resolved... Frank says the books are different, nothing wrong done, his closest board friends support him (although apparently privately, not publicly) 99% of the boards say the books are the same from the compelling visual evidence and frank has lost the trust of 99% of the board... pretty much sums it up (thumbs u I was trying to be funny - failing horribly. I'll leave the levity to those that have a better funny bone.

Feh! 406+ posts since I left yesterday and no resolution to this mess? What's the deal?

That *dot* Krypto pointed out is pretty strong evidence as well IMHO.

+1

Honestly I'd be surprised if he doesn't disappear. If he does respond what can he say? Other than the obvious: "It's not the same book" or "I'm an insufficiently_thoughtful_person/sorry"

Well, the way some boardies jumped all over her after she posted that picture, I'm not surprised. I thought that turned out to be a dude Pandora turned out to be GoonChild, etc.. No, that was Jasmine who turned out to be Goon. He/she posted an early photo off Monica Belucci and claimed it was him/her. There was someone who posted a pic of a blond in the "what do you look like thread" and I could swear it was Scar Jo. Yes, that was Pandora. But she just looked a bit like Scarlett. The photo wasn't of Scarlett. And I don't think there was any discussion that she was a shill/fake. She most recently posted in January. Here's the link to the post where she upped her photo: http://boards.collectors-society.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Board=4&Number=3611568&Searchpage=2&Main=75230&Words=Pandora&topic=0&Search=true#Post3611568 Having sold her a book, I can guarantee Pandora isn't a shill or a fake. I can imagine that she doesn't post as much given the lecherous remarks that seem to fly around here from certain members. I sold to her as well - quite a few slabs in fact. (thumbs u

CGC ∞ > PGX While I agree with this - I think the gap in narrowing. The lone PGX book I sold on eBay went for quite a bit more than I expected and probably higher than a CGC book in 9.8. For those curious it was a recent modern graded 9.9. Wow... may I ask what GPA would be for the CGC copy, and what you sold the PGX for? -slym (isn't asking for the book's title, so isn't asking for GPA like that) 35.00 GPA versus 90.00.

CGC ∞ > PGX While I agree with this - I think the gap in narrowing. The lone PGX book I sold on eBay went for quite a bit more than I expected and probably higher than a CGC book in 9.8. For those curious it was a recent modern graded 9.9.

According to SOT his sale stated 'no returns on CGC books' Did you not see this or just choose to ignore it? Then he commented he would have happily taken the book back until you jumped the gun and acted the fool.

Not with everyone. I'll start a list 1) joeypost 2)r1970d 3) thehumantorch 4) Count 5) DRX 6) flatrock02 7) slym2none 8) scottish Anyone care to join? If you're on the Probation list I don't want to buy from you or sell to you. (thumbs u -slym (thumbs u

Say it ain't so!

It says 6 customers, so maybe it was not a huge amount of people. I was just guessing it was a huge amount of people since there were 5 bottles of wine served. I did not take into a account that these people maybe alcoholics. Five bottles of wine between six people defines them as alcoholics? At a nice long, relaxed lunch, you can do a bottle each before the mains arrive. Agreed. A bottle of wine is no biggie. Lightweights. Now if it was 6 bottles of single malt Scotch... (thumbs u

(thumbs u One of the few sensible responses. Consider this receipt for lunch picked up by Roman Abramovich: $47k for lunch, and that's all going down the toilet a couple hours later... Apparently he also tipped an additional $5k on top of the automatic 20%, so his total tip was more than the sale of NM98. If someone has the cash to burn, they don't mind paying way over the odds if it gets them what they want. Why show restraint? Makes me SO glad I'm not a wine fan.

Back at ya Nick for being a fantastic customer! (thumbs u