Jaydogrules

Wow that's shocking. Someone who may or may not trade in rare variants may have sold another copy ( not the same copy, mind you) at some point in the last seven years. You're really onto something now. What must you think of Golden Age guys who literally openly trade the same copies of rare pre Robin Tecs (as an example) amongst themselves over and over, or those same copies that appear on comic connect and heritage within one year ? My god ! And there have been far more than the (actually two) sales you think were made by the one buyer. Check GPA for the full accounting of other record breaking sales across multiple grades and label types, and then make mental note of the in total of 0 CGC copies currently available on eBay to explain why this book has been blowing your mind since 2002. -J.

Well that only took three years . This is why Overstreet is mostly irrelevant these days. Better late than never. Guess this thread can finally die now. -J.

Actually, that trailer is on point. This is going to be the super hero show game changer for network television. -J.

It's nice to see (and overdue, yet ultimatly inevitable) 33 close the gap with 29 and 31 (to a lesser extent) over the last year. Classic gun holster cover, 1930s Batman, first origin, first Martha and Thomas Wayne, first Joe Chill. Can't beat that. (Unless of course, you have them all! ) -J.

I have no "tactics". When I respond it is commensurate with the person I am responding to. And I responded to babooey as well, asked him to provide any evidence of re-lists if he had any, which of course, he doesn't. Instead he did, essentially what you are accusing me of doing, but naturally you don't say anything about that to him, because you generally subscribe to the same anti-big-money-ulra-rare-variant narrative that he does. And like I said, it's old. 2003-old. -J.

-J.

I think we're in agreement. It's the same basic . We just may disagree which direction the is actually coming from. -J.

Look at the date this thread was originally started. People(ie, haters) have been saying the same basic since 2003. That's nearly 14 years now. Frankly, at some point, it gets old. And I think we are about a decade past that point now. -J.

Yes, sure. Nobody likes rare and impossible to find Batman or Spider-Man variants, got it. And I know it doesn't matter to you how few copies are actually sold or even offered for sale, whether or not the same book ever actually reappears for sale, whether or not positive feedback is left on one of both sides, what GPA decides to report, or even if the buyer and seller both come on these very boards and tell you what happened and what was paid. It's all just a big conspiracy, and none of it is real in your mind's eye. Got it. Carry on. -J.

All closed sales and feedback left on both sides, several months to a year ago. Have you seen any of the books re-listed on eBay or elsewhere that you can provide links to ? -J.

Good Lord man that is beautiful. -J.

That is a nice cover. Going to have to pick that up as well. Thanks for the heads up! -J.

I don't recall this being discussed on here, but GPA is reporting a sale of an 8.0 Tec 33 in March, 2017, for $150k. If I'm not mistaken, that was a sale through Metropolis. That is simply astounding. I'm also seeing a 6.0, Tec 31 selling for $175k in March, 2017, and a 7.5 Tec 35 for $119k in Feb, 2017. Also, a restored, coverless, married, incomplete copy of Tec 33 just went of just shy of $2k the other day on eBay. http://www.ebay.com/itm/DETECTIVE-COMICS-33-CGC-NG-Cream-to-Off-White-Coverless-Incomplete-Origin-BATMAN-/192245369064?hash=item2cc2b788e8%3Ag%3AW08AAOSwu59ZZXqt&nma=true&si=iFZRySQ5y%2FIXXG0HfR%2Fz791DLhQ%3D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557 These books have simply exploded this year. -J.

I think this must be one of those "warehouses" where they keep all the 5-15 year old ultra rare variants that a couple people used to blather on about : http://www.ebay.com/itm/BATMAN-608-RRP-Diamond-Retailer-Summit-Variant-DC-Jim-Lee-NO-RESERVE-SUPER-RARE-/222586877709?hash=item33d336370d:g:b~kAAOSwhfxZb4zh -J.

Would you mind posting it again ? -J.

For $2k I think I'd want to have the image made to order a bit. -J.

Are you kidding ? It's thought to find this book above a 5.0. Gorgeous book, good luck with your sale. -J.

Looking forward to seeing the finished product. -J.

Will he depict a specific image at your request, or do you just say "Do a Spider-Man for me" and you get what you get? -J.

This is a solid analysis. Also, Planet of the Apes really wasn't that good or exciting. Both the trailer and title are misleading and the word on that is getting out. I expect it to drop quite a bit in its second week. It was a mistake for them to release that just one week after Spider-Man and I expect the studio is already regretting that decision. -J.

So jealous of you owning these man. -J.

That's right. Cool swipe though and, congrats on the book. -J.

The only thing "Riverdale" the show has in common with the comics is the names of the characters. The show literally could have been called anything else, like "Dawson's Creek" for example, and it would have been the exact same thing. It really is a shame that it has absolutely nothing to do with the source material. -J.

If the document is real, you may be right. Of course that also means that Sony is also just as able or likely to make a movie with any of the other three dozen or so "alternative versions of Spider-man" that almost no one outside of the hobby knows about (verbiage that, itself, I'm sure was used with purpose). -J.

I don't concede. I concede that the "amendment" you linked does refer to Miles Morales but it is silent on the issue that we are discussing. I've always said Sony can use him, which they do, in cartoons. I would reckon that the original live action stipulations reside within the pages of the original agreement that Stan Lee has consistently reiterated. -J.