Here's my earlier post (one of the first). I'm not slamming the book in any way. Just making observations. I will add to my post and say it is one heckuva book and deserves the golf clap.!
I think where Barton is coming from and where I do come from is when people make statements like 'OMG, what an overgraded POS - that book should only grade a ___!'
If you're friend owned the book they probably wouldn't say that but instead would either pump the book or just remain silent.
But the internet seems to enable people to disconnect from remembering that any given book is owned by an actual person out there and that their auction prices could suffer from someone's hyperbolic posts.
There's a big difference between saying something like "I'm not a fan of tanning" and "OMG what a POS!"
Yes, I am exaggerating a bit to make my point.
True enough, but the potential buyer is also an actual person. Noting problems with a book that the buyer might overlook helps that person, while potentially hurting the seller. Unfortunately, it's a zero-sum game.
This is only a zero sum game if both buyer and seller recieve the same marginal utility per dollar on the sale price of the book. That is unlikely. It is quite likely that both buyer and seller will end up with economic surplus, meaning the seller will get more than their minimum willingness to sell price and the buyer will procure the book for less than their max willingness to pay. Both parties will be made better off. And I agree with comments posted here that comments made on this site are very unlikely to affect the price.
Beautiful book IMO. I'm glad I got the chance to stare at the scan, tanning and all.