Will_K

OP didn't seem to be referencing a specific piece of interest, just a general idea of what he wants. So the only part of the transaction known to OP is what he has to offer in trade. I like the "4 quarters < $1.00 bill" analogy. On the other hand, I could see a dealer wanting to "change" their $1.00 bill into 4 (or 5, 6, etc) quarters because it's cash flow or diversifying. From the stories about the much maligned "Los Bros", they don't care about cash flow. But some dealers might. HA is certainly willing to auction Kirby's non-splashes and even non-Kirby art. And I think @artdealer has mentioned in the past that a lot of dealers are selling some art on consignment. So dealers don't have so much flexibility that they can trade art that they don't actually own. Also, great Moon Knight cover art, it certainly appears better than how it looks in print. I'm sure your quarters are better than my $1.00 bills.

Here's my entry, Twilight 2 page 46 (1991), written by Howard Chaykin, drawn by Jose Luis Garcia-Lopez and lettered by Ken Bruzenak. Lettering for this 3 issue mini-series was pasted on. Not necessarily for this page but I have a guess that some dialog was rewritten after the pages were drawn because there's an unusual amount of word balloons with pretty long tails. Just very strange when JLGL is drawing a story. And when you see these pages for sale, they're usually missing some lettering. I got this page from Scott Dunbier back when he was originally selling art for JLGL. It's not pertinent to the story but this line makes for a fun page. I'm not a cat person but this page has my favorite line of the series: You're pretty sharp for a biped, that is-- but anybody who expects gratitude from a cat is a real azzhole."

Was able to read the article. It looks like the article has been edited and that quote is no longer there. I got the impression the article was expanded. For example, Motor Vehicle Theft currently has a separate heading/paragraph. If anyone wants to crunch the numbers, the article is based on the City of Seattle's reporting and included links: https://seattle.gov/documents/Departments/Police/Reports/2022_SPD_CRIME_REPORT_FINAL.pdf https://www.seattle.gov/police/information-and-data/crime-dashboard I've never been to the show (maybe one day). Maybe folks can give us their impressions after the convention.

Those dealers take the "deal" out of dealing. Good Luck !!

NOT AN ENDORSEMENT, JUST FYI In the most recent "Intelligent Collector" e-mail from HA.com, there was a sponsored link to a collectibles insurer. https://www.minicocollectiblesdirect.com/covered-collections/

FYI - There is a topic that is dedicated to this phenomenon in general (with examples). Somewhat entertaining.

Panel Page Art is Glen Brunswick. Graphic Collectibles is Mitch Itkowitz. I doubt either one wants to be confused with the other.

People really pay serious $$$ for the pages where you see the lugs on the bottom of the Batman's boots.

Does anyone know if Steve Oliff ever declined to color a piece of original art ?

I said the same thing. It seems like it’s bounced around and around and around for all of the two decades-plus that I’ve been collecting. I think that had an effect on it selling so low and I also just don’t think Cardy has the same fan base as he did back in 1996 when everyone wanted a Cardy cover and prices were soaring. This auction result was lower than some of his horror covers sell for. I’ve seen the Cardy art price decrease happening a lot more than I ever thought I would, but I also see the same thing happening to Neal Adams’ DC covers. I've never owned or wanted to own that cover and Nick Cardy is my favorite comic artist. It's one of a few Cardy Superman covers that have moved around. Unfortunately, Nick had the duty of drawing a lot of Superman covers when they were trying to "de-super" him. His butt was getting kicked in most of the covers of that period. A great loss is that Nick actually never drew a Superman story.

If I may ask, why is he criticized? I like his style - and I don't usually do commissions, but he's on my list to have one done. I really dig his work. I think people just believe there's a rule that Frazetta can be an influence but not THAT much of an influence. Anyway, I noticed that piece on Dueling Dealers 102. Tom Grindberg doesn't receive that criticism. He's demonstrated a strong Neal Adams influence and shifted to a strong Frazetta influence. I wish Hoffman's sketches on ebay were a little more finished. I have 2 of his inked / watercolored pieces and a large page from one of his stories.

That could be one crazy episode. There was a recent episode where Anthony was doing "end of season" deals on unsold art from previous DD's. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b74VnICzbWw You can probably use that episode to get an idea on the deals. During regular DD episodes, given enough time to work a deal, Anthony can come down quite a bit in price.

Since those stories are just one-offs, it's different than having 100 pages of the same series or character or artist. For DC horror, I'd be more willing to look at 100 title splashes if you had the entire story.

Bill is supposed to be Thor or BillaThor. Thor is Bill's favorite character. This is just the stuff that you'll learn from watching lots of episodes of DD. For example, the Recap round has been renamed the Ragnarok Recap round. Those clips (they call them memes) are what really make the show a lot longer than a plain claim show (e.g. the Dealmakers of Comic Art with Will, Bechara and Glen). Also they make DD very production intensive since they have to record those memes individually and then create effects. Since Bill used to live fairly close to Mike, they recorded a lot of things together. But since Bill recently moved to Florida, I'm sure there will be less stuff with Mike. Anthony and Sharon seem to enjoy recording stuff. When you join the channel ($4.99 / month), you're ID'd by the Thor's hammer in the chat (different colors indicate how long you've been a member). Bill also plays Billigan. This is due to Mike calling him "little buddy" on occasion (see also the Gilligan's Island themed episode of DD) in earlier episodes.

Interesting point. I usually don't post "sub par" commissions/sketches or ones that I don't do it for me (e.g. poorly drawn fishnets on the Black Canary). I mean, unless I intended to sell it.

If you do post the art, I hope you'll post the story (re: legal wrangling) .

In OP's example, overpaying (in hindsight) at auction is a conscientious choice. You basically have to live with that choice. I think we've all been there. Hopefully the market catches up to what you've paid. In another case, if I pay X for a piece today and find out I could've bought it for half of that yesterday, I might feel I overpaid. Noone forced me to pay X and theoretically, I thought it was worth X when I bought it at the time. But now would be a good time to examine one's knowledge of the market.

One artist that I follow on Patreon and Kickstarter asked to not post art in order to keep things "fresh". The artist now posts less art on IG and FB. And asked us not to post art (e.g. art rewards) so that he can use it later (e.g. for Kickstarter books). So basically, to honor that request, I'll only post art by that artist that has been published in physical form.

A reason why I don't post all of my art is that I've already posted art that represents my collecting habits and likes. You can tell which publisher I like. You can tell which artists and/or characters I like. One niche I haven't posted is my One Year Affair "strips" from National Lampoon drawn by Ralph Reese and written by Byron Preiss. And some sketch covers, nothing major or slabbed.

I know it's been asked over and over (and in different ways)... but who's buying all this art ?? I'm surprised that the market can absorb so much Jim Lee art when Albert sells it.

Aunt May should've broken a hip in that last panel. This is a great looking page. Except for the lack of backgrounds, which probably would take away from the action. I'm ignoring the price since I don't follow that market.

accountable for what ?? Interesting word choice.

I don't recall seeing comments re: price on CAF. Definitely not as much as on these boards.

I have not posted all of my art on CAF. Whenever I do post, it could be a piece I've had for anywhere between 2 weeks to when I started collecting. Why ?? Not sure. I post because art should be seen. But I don't feel the need to show all of it. I've seen that some CAF members will post art for a short amount of time (not for sale) and then take down the art.

To expand on my theory... HA Live referred to the weekly Heritage auction on Wednesdays. HA Live does not refer to ComicArtLive or Dueling Dealers. HA Live starts at 7 PM Eastern and winds down close to the start time for Dueling Dealers (9 PM Eastern). My theory is if Mike wins the coin toss and wants to catch the end of HA Live, he'll let Anthony go first.