• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

ADAMANTIUM

Member
  • Posts

    35,953
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ADAMANTIUM

  1. I went and looked and the QC thread was started in 2014, and I do recall the no inner well at all with rings in 2016 upon arrival of the new cases. @BigLeagueCHEW that is a tough pill that all of us pray it doesn't happen, and yet, idk that CGC can in your situation make it right but it's worth a shot. I'm still going to submit to CGC, and I understand why others won't. There isn't closure or a way to end this with a concise determination, other than it shouldn't have happened.
  2. Sorry I stepped away for a bit. You made valid points to me. I agree with everything you said. The comic has way too much room to move. If we had the same comic e.g. this example, let’s say valued at a million dollars, one with the tab inserts and one without, @VintageComics you would be comfortable with me simulating up and down, side to side movement without you cringing when I did the test on the tab less comic? Anyone who reads this please like if you agree that you would not want the tab less copy simulated in a test. All well and good, I'll admit I checked my copy, which is tabless and was graded in 2018. I took a sigh of relief as that seems like a while ago. I do know that since 2016 when the "new case" came around that there have been at least a bakers dozen nuances with it, so to say it has been modified since inception is an understatement. I don't recall this thread or others like it back in 2018, which I traded a hulk 181 cgc 3.0 +$325 for my asm 300 9,8. That looked like a clear win for a while, but the collector in me kept it, so gut punches aside (I'm trying to wrap my head around it) any sigh of relief I can get
  3. Awesome thanks! Further the stamina of notes: Hawkeye #1 2017, has been sold and or advertised as the 1st solo Kate Bishop, however I've yet to see a cgc label notate it. If that is why it is selling, it might be good for cgc to confirm or place it there to get word of mouth.
  4. Awesome! They crossed the streams a but signing, but still Awesome! Best of love getting Halle, I'm sure it'll happen Would be so cool
  5. All things considered and having not seen it in a while, it does look decent or formidable. I was curious also if it'll hang low or straight out from the alien, or if it is a straight up kind of deal maybe that is why there is no articulation... ? Still looks well put together and sturdy.
  6. Still looks decent, with some twinge of yellow/green/black, I see it was multiple pieces fastened together. I can see big picture will come together well, longer than I expected, and thin, but other than cracks? Any other complaints?
  7. Glad for the rivals and transformers, modern section spiked a bit because of them. 2 detailed commissions, way to go on the artgerm! Curious why no sketch covers if just for cgc? It's hard for me not to sound like a loyalist to cgc with the question, as OA is a much older market, that I'm just not in tune enough with and or especially when it comes to authentication. Like there is such a big deal made over raw sigs, but not over the art itslef for sketches, which always left me thinking too much Congrats! Look forward to the slabs! Was there on-site grading?
  8. I thought about y'all today at the lcs, as I'm searching the cheaper slabs, and he said, "oh and got this!" And he pulled out a marville slab. I chuckled I thought there was one almost nude crawling toward on the floor cover that was supposed to be the high value one, but idk and to each their own in a way, I thought if I ever found it in the wild I'd pick it up then haha
  9. I was expecting that they were lost, but then wet isn't much better, especially if you mean there are drop off options on the porch. Common sense isn't as common, but I hope they turn out OK when you open!
  10. Impressive! I didn't remember the back of the suit from the movie. You're right that it does look Impressive
  11. Speaking of cheerleaders. Found these while cleaning, appear to be Jack in the Box toy antenna balls for your vehicle. Circa 2003. I put it as the back cover picture of a JaHa comic in the registry. But I guess McDonald's is thought of more as the clown?
  12. Doesn’t seem to work on mobile. It does there have to be "new posts for the dot to show up", but if you're like me, on my tablet is easy to miss the dot and still be taken to the 1st page. Then have to go back and try again.
  13. It's appreciated 👍 For some odd reason I was trying to make it one full complete bubble of dialogue. No worries, as that barely fits most covers at all. All good.
  14. Are we not calling book covers panels? @Larryw7 @Senormac what's with the confusion 🤔 cause now I'm 🤔