ADAMANTIUM

Impressive indeed! Clesr to read the print on them, and presumably much cheaper than a scanner. My new Samsung a8 or s8 I think it is a8, but it takes everything much brighter normal. It makes it all light and or washed out idk. It doesn't pick up the fine print of the labels anymore or not as well, my galaxy samsung

Somehow I had posted a meme here for Halloween, which is because it was right above the comic memes thread and fat fingers

Awesome!!! And how did you get such clear pics? I got a new tablet that isn't near as good as the old galaxy yet is still Samsung, so idk how it is inferior when newer. But seriously those are some easy on the eyes pictures!

Sweet! Mji

Bwuwuahahahhahahahaha

Lol I think my memory clogged and can answer most of it. Ranks and points are still over all compared to everyone else, along with books, runs, and label notations, but again, also money. @wytshus I think what you're saying is when awards come, the money part doesn't matter or not as much. I was all for adjustments of points and rank, even before that tidbit. I've since noticed copper or bronze (older books) that I would consider "better" than say Ms marvel #1 from 2014, which is worth 100+ points, that I own that are worth less than that Ms marvel. That's a long anecdote to say I welcome anything that makes the registry more streamlined and cohesive to the big picture, also that makes it easier for the cgc management to update or corelate and keep current.

@wytshus It is appreciated! Are the scoring and ranks going to be filtered or change though? or new?? I appreciate the reassurance of points and ranks that it doesn't equate to final decisions, yet they're fun to look at, but then idk their true purpose? If any? I'm 16 books shy of completing X-men 94-143, but I have all the pics and my own descriptions. I welcome adjustments because, just because. I mean I'm used to the current way, yet mixing it up when most winners have already won is cool, because it is "hard to have repeat winners. This from someone who is yet to be seen in any running, given the "completeness" factor of larger sets that take time and effort, if not "only money" Lol But some few thoughts I've had, I don't know how cohesive it is to the big picture, or even, from what's been mentioned prior to my joining 2015/16 Still if there is to be poitnand rank adjustments what purpose do they serve? I guess that is my point, or how does them being adjusted change anything? Or in what capacity ?

"the duck hunt!"

That's a lot of Cool!

Whichever email, type cgc submission in the search I think, you may be able to narrow it more. I know yahoo and Gmail have a search once logged in, but I'm not in a position to narrow the search, haven't had to in a minute No worries

@Namtak

Haha yours are older than mine, mine were '92, yours may still have sugar!

Chug chug! CHUG! I wouldn't do that to another person, but hahah

Is that how the "new" cgc label looks like? concerning the newsstands? Is this back from cgc for you? or did you buy it that way? Interesting So many to "reholder" for me, if I decide too, but snap if it isn't a bit bitter, sweet!

I'm not sure your question? It takes 8 months or longer for them to "fall off." If you search your emails for the submission receipt to mail to cgc, you can find the submission number to use in the search bar. Other than that you can call cgc. Either way the latter may be a good idea

I asked the same a while ago, I don't think there is an answer. I'm not sure that I would keep it unless it was sealed, like a bottle of coke for special labeled bottles

Very TENSE rather than "intense" movie.