theCapraAegagrus

3.5 IMO.

8.5 IMO.

8.0 range.

Concur again.

I concur.

I'm 90% convinced that this person is herself, Larson. The attitude and language is consistent.

It means literally nothing. You're delusional.

I concur. Possibly a new collector...?

You're okay with performing restoration, yes?

Goal posts: Freedom <--> Fear Never changed.

Edit: I don't care anymore.

AF = "as f^&*". Not to be confused with Amazing Fantasy...

Did you even watch Civil War...? "...unlimited power and no supervision..." SHIELD was a government entity. Not the Avengers. The Avengers took 0 cues from any governing agency in the 2012 movie. They had literally nothing to do with any supervision in Age of Ultron (because Tony and Cap led the team). Stark didn't even consult anyone prior to chasing down the Maw and knighting Parker an Avenger. No one was consulted by Nat, Cap, or Stark in Endgame. I would ask you to try again, but, I don't think you understand what's going on in these movies.

The Avengers are not a military team. I never thought it was possible to be so wrong, but damn you did it.

Co-leader, bud. #fact Co-led them in Age of Ultron, led them after Cap became a criminal in Civil War, and again in Infinity War and Endgame. Apparently you don't. Captain Marvel was released in March. Marvel likes to release all of their movies in the same month for the same title. It means literally nothing.

No, I didn't. I respect freedom to govern one's property. You don't seem to understand the goal post(s). Again - No, I didn't. The discussion is freedom vs fear. People can choose to hide or choose to express their freedom. It's all about choice. One person's choice should not infringe upon another. Using fear to relinquish that choice is bad. If you choose to go out in public then you are accepting a risk. You cannot choose to have COVID-19 (well, you can, but almost no one realistically would). You can simply choose whether or not you'd like to risk it. And, no, choosing to be free is not infringing on someone's choice to isolate. I see, clearly now, that you do not understand me because you do not understand what I'm talking about. Again... Cooking a meal... My idea of freedom is literal. Some people appreciate it; others don't. The forefathers fought for it for reasons. Just to, again, be clear: We're discussing freedom vs fear. Edit: "Selfish" is probably the only accurate label you've thrown out here. Take it and run if you feel complete. We're not going to see eye-to-eye. Apparently you don't understand this particular topic and we morally disagree. I can agree to disagree. Can you?

I'm not moving any goal posts. Isolation is hiding. Not a straw-man. They're afraid of getting infected or being lectured/fined for expressing their freedom. Some are trying to stop the spread. Are they more afraid for themselves, or others...? I respect others' choices to do as they please. I'm not walking onto/into anyone's property without their permission. That's exactly where I apply 'learning from history'. That's your premise - and it's your free thought to consider it. It's still wrong. I don't have anything to knowingly spread. Freedom. That's how. I'm not relinquishing it. Those in fear can keep their distance and I will operate as usual. Risk vs reward. Those who don't want the risk of infection can hide. All the power to 'em. I prefer taking the risk for fruit of the reward. Is commerce sanitizing everything for a week or two before providing it to the public? Nope. This thing is gonna play out how it wants to play out. I'm not gonna stop it alone and I'm not gonna allow it to stop me. Edit: It comes down to the philosophical quote. Either you haven't considered the history of power - or don't think it will repeat itself. I am not interested in reliving that fight. I will, if I have to, though. It's worth fighting IMO. Just like you think it's worth fighting this virus by sacrificing freedom (I don't).

3.5 IMO.

No idea.

It's your entire premise that doesn't allow you to accept differing actions or opinions. If those in fear are in hiding, and I'm not invading their choice to hide, then how am I endangering anyone? Any time you drive a car - there's a chance you get into an accident. Any time you own a house - there's a chance it catches fire, or floods, or there's an electrical problems. Any time you go out in public - there's a chance you get robbed, trip over your own feet, or get the flu. Sacrificing freedom over fear isn't the answer. It may be for some, but just because a minority suffers, doesn't mean you force your opinions unto others.

Pretty sure Snyder, or someone in charge of Suicide Squad, said that the Joker who killed Robin was already dead in Worlds of DC. Some speculated that Jason Todd is Leto's Joker. It was a long time ago. WODC is a joke, though, so it wouldn't surprise me if there was more than 1 theory on this whole thing. Note: Google isn't helping me corroborate this. Could be wrong, but that's what I've thought/known this whole time. I agree. The coming together of JL was a dream-come-true (concept-wise). The interference by WB and theatrical release both butchered it. #ReleaseTheSnyderCut Snyder is a true comic book fan. His visual style is phenomenal, and he did have a plan for Worlds of DC. It's too bad that we're left to suffer the consequences of his firing. I prefer the serious tones that his movies portray. It was severely lacking in Justice League.

Accumulation of voices = louder than 1 voice.. I thought that was obvious. The point stands. People can take someone aside and call them a failure, but ultimately, personal success determines that - not what other people said out of their own misunderstanding.

I have - you simply disagree with it based on your personal perception. Your 3rd sentence makes no sense. What are you basing this off of...? Again - I can cook you a meal, but I cannot tell you how to discern its ingredients or flavors. You just don't get it , I guess. I cannot fix it for you. Slapping labels that don't belong on something does not make it what you're trying to make it. Edit: I'll make it easy for ya, buddy; If being incorrectly labelled "immature" by you is simply your idea of someone learning from history - I'll take it. Blind appeal to authority is fool's gold.

Loud voices aren't correct by default.